PC 052202 - Laserfiche WebLink

,-.. Chairperson Maas commented that open fencing requirement that was placed on Mr. Chestnut's project was important to her. She noted that while the fencing looks very nice the way it is, she is bothered that projects are conditioned and that applicants are allowed to do whatever they want. Mr. Iserson commented that Mr. Chestnut went through a process to approve the change as a modification. He noted that Mr. Swift made the determination to allow the modification knowing that the Planning Commission would have the opportunity to consider this matter when the action was reported. Chairperson Maas questioned whether the modification was approved prior to the construction of the fence. Mr. Iserson advised that this item could be brought to the Planning Commission if they want to review this action. Commissioner Roberts noted that The South Livermore Agricultural Land Trust "Get Acquainted Event" is scheduled for Wednesday, June 12, from 5:30 p.m. -7:30 p.m., which is the date of the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. She suggested that the Planning Commission begin a little later than the regular time. Discussion ensued regarding the potential items for the next meeting. There was consensus to begin the June 12 meeting at 7:30 p.m. Chairperson Maas suggested that the agenda be developed so that the more critical items be placed later on the agenda to allow for all of the Commissioners to be in attendance when they are heard. 8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION (continued) a. Future Planning Calendar ,,-- In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Kameny, Mr. Iserson provided an update on the most recent communications with Pacific Union Homes. In response to a question from Commissioner Sullivan, Mr. Iserson advised that there is no definite date has been scheduled for the Ponderosa/Busch application. Commissioner Kameny advised that the applicant made a full presentation to the Housing Commission last Thursday. Commissioner Sullivan questioned whether the Heinz/Greenbriar project would come back as a work study session or a PUD public hearing. Chairperson Maas noted that she is ready to see the PUD and questioned why another work session is needed. Commissioner Sullivan advised that he would like the opportunity to discuss some alternative grading options. Commissioner Kameny stated that he would like to see the grading alternatives incorporated into the PUD public hearing, and he does not need to have another work session. Commissioner Sullivan advised that he wants to be sure that they are exploring all of the options prior to considering approval of the project. b. Actions of the City Council No action was taken. .-- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 22, 2002 Page 12