PC 112801 - Laserfiche WebLink

On behalf of the Historic Preservation Ordinance Task Force, Roger McLain presented a r- commendation to Bonnie Shamblin for her work as chairperson of the Task Force. THE PUBLC HEARING WAS OPENED Louis Rivara, 628 Saint Mary Street, noted that he feels the Historic Preservation Ordinance is critical and something that Pleasanton needs. He also cited situations where property owners have had difficulty in making modifications to their property. He advised that in addition to implementing the ordinance, the process needs to be clear and "user-friendlier." He suggested using questionnaires to get feedback from people who have gone through the process recently. Art Dunkley, 4672 Second Street, advised that while he supports every thought behind this ordinance (except control and meddling), he is scared of this ordinance. He stated the focus should be on ambience and historical feeling, not individual buildings. He noted that the Ordinance has undergone a major rewrite in the last 90 days, and it has been difficult to follow and provide public input. He suggested that this item be postponed for 60 to 90 days to give further opportunity for review. He commented that he feels this ordinance is based on added restrictions and proposed an historical enhancement ordinance that is based on City policies and staff support for neighborhood preservation groups. He stated that ambience should be the goal, not the age of the building. He advised that he would like the Planning Commission to lead the City to commit capital resources to Downtown neighborhoods. He suggested that the Planning Commission postpone this item and ask staff to look at some creative alternatives that make the Ordinance neighborhood-based. - Michael O'Callaghan, 125 West Neal Street, stated that he is concerned about an added level of bureaucracy. He noted that it is confusing to him as to the right way to accomplish this. He further noted that he is in agreement with the hard effort of staff and the Task Force members, but he is not comfortable with the proposed ordinance. Robert Cordtz, 262 West Angela, voiced support for Mr. Dunkley's comments. He cited language on page 2 of the staff report which states: "Landmark designations could be established with or without consent of the property owner," noting that this is of concern to him. He advised that he would like to see a copy of the State Uniform Building Code and the resolution which temporarily allows for the use of the Code, and he would also like to know what cities have initiated that type of ordinance. He also asked for information regarding who in the City is doing something under that code in the Downtown. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commissioner Sullivan noted that he is upset by the "remodeling" of houses that basically demolish the house, leaving one wall; and the renovation of an historic structure in such a way that the original building is no longer distinguishable upon completion. He said that the way he reads the Ordinance it prevents these things from happening and asked that staff confirm that this is correct. Mr. Rasmussen confirmed that this is accurate. r- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 28, 2001 Page 15