My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102401
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
PC 102401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:40:49 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 7:38:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/24/2001
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 102401
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Roberts: Thinks the rock wall is fine, especially now that she has seen a <br />,-. material sample. <br />Commissioner Harvey: Doesn't have a strong feeling about it; has confidence that the <br />landscape architect and the builder will do the right thing, given the attention given to the <br />entire project. <br />There was consensus to defer this issue to the discretion of the staff and applicant. <br /> <br />3. Whether the redesigned landscaping at the Arlington entrance is acceptable in preserving <br />southbound views of the lake from Sunol Blvd. <br />There was consensus to request a photo montage with new landscaping, depicting views <br />driving south on Sunol Blvd., north of Arlington. <br /> <br />4. Whether the median trees should be stopped before Arlington Drive. <br />Commissioner Roberts: Usually the neighbors want those trees to mitigate sound and break <br />up the view of the road. <br />Commissioner Harvey: Suggested a hedge, rather than trees, but this would not be a good <br />idea if it causes discontinuity with what already exists. <br />There was consensus to provide more spacing on the trees, per staff. <br /> <br />5. Whether the natural, oak tree landscaping should replace the doubletree row of sycamores <br />southerly of Arlington Drive. <br />There was consensus to support this change. <br /> <br />,-- <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Whether the building's architecture is acceptable for the proiect, including its: <br />a. cornice treatment <br />There was consensus to support the architect's preference. <br /> <br />b. exterior wall expression <br />There was consensus to defer this to be worked out by the staff and the applicant. <br /> <br />c. color scheme <br />Commissioner Roberts: for LEED certification it has to be light. <br />Commissioner Arkin: O.K. with what the applicant is proposing. <br />There was consensus to support the lighter color scheme (option # I). <br /> <br />d. southerly elevation of Building A <br />Commissioner Roberts: Would like to see this come back. <br />Commissioner Arkin: Would not support any type of mirror or painting on this <br />building. He is looking for something that is subtle and fits into the beauty of the <br />architecture. O.K. with the letters "AIB," but does not want the painted screen. <br />Commissioner Harvey: Three options: hide it with landscaping; do nothing and <br />just have the end of the building show; or highlight and showcase the end of the <br />building. Get some options for highlighting the end of the building. <br />Commissioner Sullivan: Would like a photo montage driving north on 1-680 at a <br />location closer to the building. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />October 24, 2001 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.