My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091201
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
PC 091201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:40:22 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 7:32:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/12/2001
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 091201
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />b. Actions of the City Council <br /> <br />,,-- <br /> <br />No action was taken. <br /> <br />c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />It was noted that Chairperson Sullivan and Commissioner Arkin appealed the request for an <br />extension of the PUD approval for the Lemoine project. Mr. Swift advised that this item is <br />scheduled to be heard at the October 10 meeting. Mr. Swift noted that the method for the appeal <br />process for the Planning Commission is being studied for all levels of staff approvals and staff <br />will be developing one clear policy. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Maas, Commissioner Arkin advised that he was <br />not on the Commission when the project was approved and he would like an opportunity to <br />discuss the project. He further advised that he feels if a project is not developed prior to the <br />lapsing deadline it should be reviewed. Chairperson Sullivan advised that he appealed the <br />extension because he did not support the project initially, and that he feels when a project of this <br />magnitude reaches the end of the approval there should be an opportunity to discuss whether the <br />approval should be extended. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift clarified that if the final map is approved by the City Council prior to the lapsing date, <br />there would be no reason to extend the PUD approval. <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />d. <br /> <br />"Draft Compact for a Sustainable Bay Area" <br /> <br />Chairperson Sullivan advised that the Commission has received a copy of the "Draft Compact <br />for a Sustainable Bay Area" and they have been asked to comment on the draft. Commissioner <br />Maas questioned whether the Planning Commission had agreed to send a letter with the <br />Commission's comments. Chairperson Sullivan stated that he thought that is what the <br />Commission agreed to. <br /> <br />Chairperson Sullivan stated that he would like to make some general comments. He noted that <br />no matter what ultimately comes out of the development of this document, he feels that the <br />regionalized dialogue that is taking place is good. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts stated that she agrees with Chairperson Sullivan regarding the <br />opportunity for dialogue, but that she feels the document is very general, and because it is so <br />politically correct it is difficult to criticize it. She further stated that there are some things in the <br />document that do not apply to Pleasanton because ofthe way they are worded. She noted that <br />while these issues should be discussed, she feels some ofthe issues are centered on cities with <br />larger urban problems. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas referred to a comment made at the meeting of the Housing Element Task <br />Force meeting on Monday night related to ABAG's demands. She stated that she agrees with <br />Commissioner Roberts, in that the City can only do what it can to meet housing requirements. <br /> <br />,-- <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />September 12,2001 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.