PC 091201 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairperson Sullivan asked if there is a condition for staff to complete a visual or dimensional ,,-- check of the actual tree in comparison to the drawing to ensure that it is built according to the design. Ms. Kline advised that staff does a site inspection routinely with all development projects. She explained that the project would not receive a final sign-off until the project is completed as approved. Commissioner Maas suggested that a condition be added requiring that a visual of the completed project be submitted to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Roberts suggested that the commissioners visit the site when the project is completed. Ms. Seto suggested that visuals of the completed project be provided to the Planning Commission and ifthere are any concerns these can be addressed prior to the project receiving a final. In response to a question from Chairperson Sullivan, Ms. Seto advised that there is a provision in the City's ordinance requiring the removal of the tree pole, should the operation of the facility cease. She further advised that a bond will be posted to ensure the removal. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT ,-- Pat Sausedo, 4634 Chabot Drive, represented Sprint PCS and Nextel Communications. Ms. Sausedo described the proposed antenna, noting that it completely adheres to the City's telecommunications policy with regard to setbacks. She noted that Mr. Peter Hillard ofNextel and Mr. Dennis Martin are present to answer any specific questions. She advised that they are requesting the change to Condition #8, as stated by Ms. Kline. Commissioner Arkin asked if there is a contingency plan to bring in an emergency tower should this facility become inoperable. Ms. Sausedo advised that they have temporary facilities on trailers that can be set on site and made operational until the permanent facility can be repaired. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commissioner Maas moved approval of Case PDR-84, subject to the conditions of the staff report, with a modification to Condition #8, changing "property owner" to "applicant," and requiring that before and after visuals be provided to the Planning Commission to guarantee that the tree has been constructed as proposed. Commissioner Arkin seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Arkin, Maas, Roberts, and Sullivan None Commissioner Kameny Commissioner Harvey Resolution No. PC-2001-44 was entered and adopted as motioned. ,-- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 12, 2001 Page 3