PC 080801 - Laserfiche WebLink

r-- Ms. Sausedo advised that they have tried to accommodate staff s requests. She stated that according to Mr. Pavan, lowering the Nextel antennas would require another peer review. She advised that she feels it is inappropriate to ask Sprint and Nextel to go back and start allover again when they have been trying to accommodate the City's request to include a third carrier. Commissioner Kameny noted that during a previous review of this matter, the Commission had requested that more foliage be added to the tree pole. Ms. Sausedo advised that they can address the concerns about the tree pole not being as stealth as the Commission desires, but if they are being asked to restructure the design and re-engineer the tree pole, they would be starting all over again. She stated that they would like to be back no later than the first meeting in September and she feels that it is fair for them to ask for that consideration. Vice Chairperson Maas confirmed that the Commission is in agreement with the direction stated in items 1 through 11 of the staff report, and that the flag pole is appropriate if it is located on the ground in front of the Lock-It-Up Storage facility. The Commission also agreed that the tree should be as short as possible, but still maintain a natural tree look. Discussion ensued regarding the necessity for peer review. Mr. Pavan advised that the need for a peer review would be dependent on whether the applicant advises that the height of the antenna arrays cannot be lowered even if the number of carriers is reduced. r- Mr. Stamos requested that item #4 on the list of directions to the applicants be deleted if Cingular installs its antennas on the tree pole, because they would be limited to three panels. Mr. Stamos clarified that they would like to proceed with their proposal for the flagpole in front of the facility. The Planning Commission recessed for a break at 8:40 p.m. Vice Chairperson Maas reconvened the meeting at 8:45 p.m. Commissioner Harvey returned to the dais. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. PUD-80-16-19D & 11M. Providian Bancom Application for development plan approval and a major modification to PUD-80-16 to allow the construction of a three-story, 90,000-square-foot building on the Providian Bancorp campus located at 4940 Johnson Drive. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - 1/C-O (Industrial/Commercial-Office) District. The Planning Commission will also consider the negative declaration prepared for the project. Continued to September 12,2001. ,-- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 8, 2001 Page 7