Laserfiche WebLink
<br />architect to pattern this building after the Signature Headquarters building, as he sees this as a <br />,--. timeless design, and he also wanted it to fit with the modern architecture around it. He noted that <br />arches will take away from the combination of the timelessness and warmness of the colors, and <br />the square lines which make the building fit in with the adjacent buildings. With regard to the <br />removal of the column, he asked if it would really make that much difference. He noted that <br />they have implemented Mr. Cannon's suggestions that they feel really would add to the project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas advised that the staff report indicated that the Planning Commission had <br />determined during its review of the Safe America building that the building design for this site <br />should complement the design of the Safe America building. Mr. Barkdull advised that they <br />were told that, and they spoke with Mr. Paxson and explained the reasons why they wanted to do <br />something different. He advised that there was support for their ideas. He noted that they are <br />trying to build a quality building that will stand out and be stylish for a long time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin questioned the green glazing of the windows. Mr. Barkdull advised that <br />they are trying to use the same glazing used at 5100 Franklin. He noted that if the green color is <br />an issue, he would be willing to use a bronze glazing. In response to Commissioner Kameny's <br />inquiry, Mr. Miers advised that they would attempt to use the same color glass as that of the <br />building on Franklin. <br /> <br />.,.-.. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas asked Mr. Cannon how he feels the proposed building works with the Safe <br />America building. He commented that he is much fonder of the proposed building than the Safe <br />America building. He noted that staff had advised that it was o.k. to proceed with this type of <br />building and that applicant has been told that if this design is approved, the quality of detail has <br />to be very high. He advised that he based his evaluation on this direction. He further advised <br />that he does not believe that the detail of this proposal is up to the standards of the Signature <br />Headquarters building. Mr. Cannon reported on the suggestions that he feels would enhance the <br />building design. He noted that he feels the green glazing is the best, the blue would not go with <br />the wall color, and the bronze color would be too dark when looking through it from the inside. <br />He suggested that the applicant provide a large sample of the glass so that staff could look at it <br />outdoors. He also noted that he does not feel the landscape plan lends itself to what the owner is <br />trying to accomplish in the entry area. Mr. Cannon confirmed that a piece of public art or water <br />element could be featured in this area. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas stated that she is concerned that the Planning Commission's direction that <br />the design of this building was suppose to complement the Safe America building was ignored. <br />She advised that she likes the proposed building, but she does not feel the buildings complement <br />each other at all. She commented that the only way she feels this can be resolved is to make <br />these two separate projects by not having them adjoin at the parking lot and increasing the <br />landscaping between the two parcels to show that they are two separate properties. Mr. Kishi <br />advised that this could effect the circulation and the Fire Department was very pleased with <br />having the full circulation around the site and not having to worry about a turn-around. <br /> <br />,--. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />July 11,2001 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />