Laserfiche WebLink
<br />specific because this is an infill site in a residential neighborhood. Discussion ensued regarding <br />,,-- the appropriate wording of this condition to ensure that the neighbors are not impacted by dust <br />during this development. <br /> <br />Chairperson Sullivan advised that he feels these are very nice homes, and he agrees that two <br />houses are better than four or eleven, but they are not compatible with the houses on the other <br />side of the street. The Planning Commission discussed the issue of compatibility with the <br />existing homes. It was noted that they are compatible with the homes on the top of the hill. <br /> <br />Chairperson Sullivan asked if there is a creative way to save the oak tree that is four inches from <br />the retaining wall. He suggested that the road could be bowed-out slightly to save the tree and <br />not cause a problem from a traffic standpoint. Mr. Pavan stated that the Commission could <br />direct that an arborist supervise any work done close to the tree. Chairperson Sullivan advised <br />that he would like to see something done to more actively save the tree. Discussion ensued <br />regarding this matter. Commissioner Maas suggested that the value of the tree be determined so <br />that if the tree is lost this amount can be placed in the Urban Forestry Fund. Chairperson <br />Sullivan commented that he would like to see the tree saved. Commissioner Maas concurred. <br />Mr. Pavan advised that the applicant has indicated that he will do everything he can to save the <br />tree. <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />Commissioner Harvey stated that he feels it is a good project and is pleased that steel is being <br />utilized in the construction. He advised that Kottinger is a fairly heavily used cut-through street <br />and cars park on both sides of the street, and he has concerns about the storage of construction <br />materials on the street. Mr. Jost advised that the storage of construction materials is controlled <br />by the encroachment permit process, and typically the City does not allow construction materials <br />to remain over night on the street. Commissioner Harvey asked if a condition could be added <br />requiring the applicant to create a storage location on the site. Mr. Walsh advised that this could <br />be a challenge for the first week, but once the pad is set, they should be able to keep construction <br />materials off of the street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas moved to (1) make the finding that the proposed project will not have <br />a significant impact on the environment and adopt a resolution recommending approval of <br />the draft negative declaration with the finding of "de minimus impact;" (2) make the <br />finding that the proposed PUD development plan and house designs are consistent with the <br />General Plan and the purposes of the PUD ordinance; and (3) recommend approval of <br />Case PUD-12, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit "B" with the following <br />modifications: <br />. Construction shall be limited to Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; <br />. Open fencing shall be required, with the exception that there will be limited privacy <br />fencing; <br />. Every effort shall be made to preserve the oak tree along the retaining wall, and if it <br />cannot be saved the amount of the value of the tree shall be placed in the Urban <br />Forestry Fund; <br />. A construction staging plan that will minimize any storage of construction materials on <br />Kottinger Drive shall be implemented as soon as possible; <br /> <br />,-- <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />July 11,2001 <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />