PC 052301 - Laserfiche WebLink

been incorporated. Mr. Pavan advised that Mr. Cannon is present this evening to speak to r- architectural issues concerning the proposal. Mr. Pavan presented information regarding the traffic report prepared for this project. He noted that the property owners of the Stanley Business Park have conveyed title to the City of an 18-foot strip ofland along the Stanley Boulevard side of the project to be used for street improvements. Discussion ensued regarding the proposed double drive-through lanes, as well as how cars would enter and exit the project. Mr. Pavan advised that staff will be working with the applicant to incorporate LEED measures into the project. He noted that a tenant within the business park expressed concern about the visibility of the equipment in the play area, and a condition of approval has been added to require darkened glass in this area. In response to a question from Commissioner Roberts, Mr. Pavan noted that cars exiting on to Stanley Boulevard would only be allowed to make a right turn. Mr. Pavan also noted that the Traffic Engineering staff has found that a deceleration lane is not needed. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Kameny, Mr. Grubstick described the proposal for the eastbound lanes on Stanley at the intersection of Valley and Bernal. Mr. Grubstick advised that there is funding for widening Stanley on the east side of Bernal. r- Commissioner Maas stated that while she is a business owner in this area, she does not have a conflict of interest with this application. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Maas, Mr. Pavan advised that the Planning Commission is looking at the site plan for the proposed commercial building pad, but the design of the building will be brought back to the Planning Commission. He noted that the Planning Commission could provide any comments that it feels are appropriate to be applied to the proposed building this evening. Commissioner Maas questioned the use of the proposed commercial building. Mr. Pavan stated that if the proposed use is allowed by the PUD development plan, the application would be for design review, but if the future applicant wanted a use that is not covered by the development plan, it would require a PUD modification. Chairperson Sullivan asked if the information in the staff report which states that at General Plan Buildout the LOS at the Stanley Boulevard/Bernal Avenue intersection with this project, including traffic improvements and mitigations, would be LOS "E" (v.c. ratio of .98) is accurate. Staff confirmed that this is correct. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Arkin, Mr. Pavan noted that the Municipal Code allows for a federal, state, county, or city flags to be flown, but ifthe an applicant wants to fly a corporate flag, it becomes a factor of the sign program. He further noted that staff and previous Planning Commissions have not supported flying corporate flags. Commissioner Arkin questioned proposed uses for the other corners of the Stanley/BernalNalley intersection. Mr. Pavan advised that there has been discussion of a supermarket/neighborhood --- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 23, 2001 Page 3