PC 042501 - Laserfiche WebLink

these lots is constructed, in place, and accepted by the City, rather than not allowing any of those ,-- lots to sold. Mr. Swift advised that the City will hold a bond and there will be an improvement plan before the final map can be recorded, and lots cannot be sold until a final map is recorded. Discussion ensued regarding the amount of the bond that would be required, how the bond process functions, and the final map process. Mr. Swift advised that the actual improvements to realize the Vineyard Corridor infrastructure will be part of the Deleo subdivision, and the only improvements left for the Costas property to complete would be the cul-de-sac to serve four ofthe Costas lots. He further advised that the other two Costas lots will be served by streets constructed by Delco. Mr. Swift clarified that Mr. Costas purchased his lots back from Deleo following the PUD approval process. Commissioner Maas referred to the letter from Data Sales which the Planning Commission received this evening. Mr. Swift advised that all three issues in the letter are addressed through staffs recommendation to modify Condition #6. Commissioner Arkin asked for clarification regarding the school fees. Mr. Swift advised that Mr. Costas will be required to sign a school fee agreement. Mr. Swift clarified that Mr. Costas is not part of the agreement between Delco, Greenbriar, Centex, and the School District to front the costs of some of the infrastructure. r- Commissioner Kameny referred to the Open Space Management Plan and asked if the reference to open space areas should read Parcels C and "D," rather than Parcels "B" and C. Mr. Swift confirmed that Commissioner Kameny is correct. Mr. Swift stated that there are a number of issues that the applicant has discussed with the Engineering Department and that Delco will review its requests for modifications to the conditions of approval that pertain to these matters. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Maas, Mr. Swift clarified the process for the development and design review of the Hahner property parcels. In response to a question from Chairperson Sullivan regarding the land trust easement, Mr. Swift advised that the City Council determined that the easement would be made to the City, with the Land Trust as a third party beneficiary, and the City Council directed staffto work out the final language for the easement. Ms. Seto advised that language has not yet been finalized. Chairperson Sullivan questioned the PUD condition requiring that the vineyard must be planted prior to the construction of the final 25% of the houses. He asked for clarification as to how this would work with the separation of the Delco and Costas developments. Mr. Swift advised that the PUD is the entire project. Chairperson Sullivan stated that potentially 27 of the 30 houses on the Hahner property could be constructed before the vineyard is installed, and the vineyard might not go in ifthe Costas houses are not built. Mr. Swift stated that the Planning Commission could provide clarification regarding this requirement by adding a condition of approval to the tentative map. r- April 25, 2001 Page 7 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES