My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
100510
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2010 2:12:09 PM
Creation date
9/30/2010 2:12:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/5/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> Since March of this year, a 21- member Hacienda Task Force has been meeting to <br /> discuss the appropriate form and design of residential or mixed use Transit Oriented <br /> Development (TOD) on three vacant sites near the Dublin /Pleasanton BART station in <br /> Hacienda, owned by W.P. Cary, BRE, and Roche. The outcome of this work will be a set <br /> of recommendations to the City Council for standards and guidelines by which future <br /> projects on these sites will be evaluated. At the time the Task Force was established, it <br /> was anticipated that its work would be completed in approximately a year to 18 months. <br /> In August 2010, the City Council reached a Settlement Agreement with the plaintiffs in <br /> Urban Habitat v. City of Pleasanton, a lawsuit that claimed that various City policies and <br /> ordinances prevented or hindered the development of affordable housing. Part of that <br /> Settlement Agreement requires the adoption of two types of development standards for <br /> the three vacant parcels near the BART station in Hacienda Business Park: <br /> • Core Development Standards including a minimum density of 30 units per <br /> acre for residential development, a minimum of 130 residential units <br /> affordable to very-low income households, the acceptance of Section 8 <br /> Rental Vouchers, a specific bedroom mix for the affordable units, and units <br /> to be dispersed throughout the development. These standards must be <br /> approved no later than January 4, 2011. <br /> • Non -Core Development Standards and Design Guidelines that are not <br /> inconsistent with the Core Development Standards described above (i.e. <br /> would not make those standards infeasible). These are standards such as <br /> building height, Floor Area Ratio, street setbacks, and parking ratios (which <br /> would generally be stated as a numeric standard) and guidelines which <br /> may be more subjective and less measurable (e.g. the requirement for <br /> "high quality building materials "). These standards must be adopted no <br /> later than March 1, 2011. <br /> Staff is seeking assistance in preparing the "non- core" development standards and <br /> guidelines. As well as meeting the requirements of the Settlement Agreement, these <br /> standards and guidelines must meet the objective of creating a high quality living and <br /> working environment, be comprehensive and easily understandable, and be economically <br /> viable. Clear and understandable graphics will be needed to illustrate the type of <br /> development desired. <br /> Although City planning staff will be involved in and directing all aspects of preparing the <br /> standards, because of the amount of work stemming from the Settlement Agreement, the <br /> specialized nature of the skills required to prepare the standards and guidelines, and the <br /> strict deadlines imposed by the agreement, staff believes consultant assistance is <br /> needed to ensure timely completion of this project. <br /> CONSULTANT SELECTION <br /> In order to meet the deadline set by the Settlement Agreement and because of the need <br /> to select a consultant with expertise and experience both as a TOD developer and <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.