My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 021401
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
PC 021401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:36:16 PM
Creation date
3/27/2003 7:28:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/14/2001
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 021401
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r- Mr. Swift provided additional information regarding the Business Park and the potential for <br />rezoning. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin referred to the handout provided by staff, noting that there is approximately <br />four million square feet of office space in the City that has been approved, but not yet occupied. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the City's traffic model, the status of the traffic at 1-580 and <br />Hopyard Road, and the information provided in the staff report related to the traffic impacts of <br />this proposal. Chairperson Sullivan referenced Table IV of the traffic report prepared for the <br />project which shows that at General Plan build-out with the project, the Hopyard/Owens <br />intersection at P.M. is LOS F and more than 25% over capacity. <br /> <br />COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />Scott Graeser of Chamberlin Associates represented the applicant. He provided an overview of <br />the site, noting that it is not a good site for a stand-alone restaurant. He stated that the site needs <br />a higher density development to be viable. He advised that they are aware that traffic is a big <br />issue especially in the north Pleasanton area and that they tried to come up with a project that fits <br />the site and has a positive traffic situation. He commented on the types of tenant uses that could <br />occupy the building. Mr. Graeser stated that the applicant does not feel retail or a conference <br />center use is feasible for this site because of the traffic generated for these uses. He further <br />stated that there are numerous conference facilities and meeting rooms available within the area. <br />He commented on the design of the proposed building and provided the Commission with <br />streetscapes depicting the proposed building in comparison to surrounding buildings. He noted <br />that the existing landscaping will be retained. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />No one addressed this item. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts advised that she met with Mr. Chamberlin. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin noted that he loves the LEED certification for this building, but has a <br />problem with the land use, noting that there are not a lot of mixed uses in the Business Park. He <br />noted that he also has a hard time with the architecture. He stated that he would like to see <br />architecture that fits in with the surrounding buildings. Commissioner Arkin stated that he has a <br />difficult time approving this project knowing it will not go to Council, and that the Council <br />should have an opportunity to decide if the zoning of this property should be reviewed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts advised that she would love this building almost anywhere else. She <br />noted that she loves the LEED certification and she feels the traffic issue is fine. She noted that <br />she believes the rest of the community should have some say about this decision, and if the <br />Planning Commission must initiate a rezoning so that there is more public input, she would <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />February 14,2001 <br /> <br />Page II <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.