Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Roberts seconded the motion. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Arkin, Maas, and Roberts <br />Commissioner Sullivan <br />Commissioner Kameny <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-2001-05 was entered and adopted recommending approval of the Negative <br />Declaration prepared for Case PUD-OO-OI. <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-2001-06 was entered and adopted recommending approval of Case <br />PUD-OO-O 1. <br /> <br />Chairperson Sullivan commented that he voted no because he was unable to make the required <br />findings for reasons he stated earlier with regard to Lots 33, 34, 35, and 36. <br /> <br />Chairperson Sullivan advised that Item 6.b., PDR-8I/PCUP-20, would not be heard this evening <br />due to time constraints. He advised that this item would be the first item on the February 28 <br />meeting agenda. <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />r. <br /> <br />a. <br /> <br />PUD-81-30-84D, Chamberlin Associates <br />Application for design review approval to demolish an existing restaurant building and <br />construct a two-story office building totaling approximately 44,250 square feet on 2.7 <br />acres of land at 5075 Hopyard Road in the Hacienda Business Park. Zoning for the <br />property is PUD-I/C-O (Planned Unit Development - Industrial/Commercial-Office) <br />District. <br /> <br />Mr. Pavan presented the staff report, providing an overview of the proposal and details regarding <br />the project. He noted that the project is well designed and an architectural peer review was not <br />required. He advised that the building meets the "Certified" level of the LEED rating system. <br />He stated that this is the first time in the Hacienda Business Park where a site has been <br />redeveloped with a change of use. He commented on the traffic impacts associated with the <br />proposed change. Mr. Pavan also advised that interest has been expressed that this site be <br />developed as a large restaurant with meeting room space. He noted that staff supports the <br />proposed change for office use. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Commissioner Arkin, Mr. Pavan stated that if the Planning <br />Commission approves this application it would not go to the City Council. Mr. Arkin noted that <br />this is the first time the community has had an opportunity to look at the zoning within the Park <br />to determine if it should be changed. Mr. Pavan advised that if the Planning Commission <br />determines that the office use is not appropriate for this site, the Planning Commission could <br />initiate a rezoning of the site. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />February 14,2001 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />