PC 011001 - Laserfiche WebLink

/""" In response to a question from Commissioner Roberts, Ms. Seto advised that in an emergency situation related to creek maintenance the City would have the right to take care of it immediately, and charge the cost back to the Homeowners' Association. Mr. Swift commented that the applicant has agreed to include as an option on the new homes the installation of a solar panel photo voltaic cells for generating electricity. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Maas regarding the setback for Lot I, Mr. Swift advised that this lot currently stands by itself, in that there are no homes in the Greenbriar project on that side of the street. He noted that there may be one more houses on this street on the Brinkhurst property, depending on where that home receives access. He further noted that the house on Lot 1 would not be sticking out forward ofthe rest of the houses on the street. In response to a request for clarification from Commissioner Arkin, Mr. Swift advised that the City Council's conditioning of the PUD tied the development of this property to the approval and building of the Happy Valley Golf Course and the annexation of the Happy Valley area. Mr. Swift further clarified that this project would not go to a final map without the annexation as provided in Condition #3. r' Commissioner Arkin inquired as to the plan for "B" Street. Mr. Swift responded that the plan is to have "B" Street extend into the Lund Ranch to serve the development on that property. He advised that this street would bring the traffic from Lund Ranch out to Sycamore Road. Discussion ensued regarding the proposed width of"B" Street. Mr. Swift advised that the mid- point of the General Plan for the Lund property is 85 homes. Commissioner Arkin stated that he would want to ensure that the homebuyers along this street are advised of the potential development of Lund Ranch and the traffic impacts on "B" Street. Discussion ensued regarding providing this information in the sales office and other means of conveying this information. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT Fred Bates, 9781 Blue Larkspur Lane, Monterey, represented the applicant, New Cities Development Group. Mr. Bates advised that the applicant supports the staff report, the findings, and the vesting tentative tract map conditions with the exception of Condition #3 regarding the approval of the project being conditioned on the Happy Valley annexation. He noted that typically on the display table future developments are shown. He further noted that at the time of sale these items are signed-off by the buyer and they are included in the preliminary title report. In response to a request for clarification from Commissioner Kameny, Mr. Swift confirmed that the approval of the project being contingent on the annexation is also a PUD condition of approval. /""" PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 10,2001 Page 3