Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r Is the day care center appropriately located? - Commissioner Arkin advised that he feels the best <br />location for the day care center is on the same side of the street as the school. Discussion ensued <br />regarding the possible locations of the day care center, the proposed siting of the elementary <br />school, and the transportation and traffic impacts resulting from the day care center. <br /> <br />Is the setback from Vineyard Avenue to the Vineyard estate lots satisfactory? - Yes. <br /> <br />Is the planting area wrapped around Lot 44 useful to create an open feeling for the village? - <br />Chairperson Sullivan voiced his approval for the Parcel B plan, noting that he wished all were <br />like it. <br /> <br />Is the private road serving Lots 1-4 and 44 acceptable? - Yes. <br /> <br />Should the corners of Lots 10 and 12 be "shaved" off (angled) to create a more informal and <br />possibly easier to maintain vineyard edge? - Commissioner Kameny noted that he has no <br />feelings either way. <br /> <br />Is the lot line adiustment with Safreno acceptable? - Yes. <br /> <br />,,-- <br /> <br />Is the Parcel "C" open space a satisfactory use/location? - Chairperson Sullivan asked for a <br />visual or drawing depicting the proposed bridge, showing the height of the bridge over the creek. <br />Commissioner Arkin advised that he would like the architecture of the bridge to match the <br />architecture of the development. In response to an inquiry from Chairperson Sullivan, Mr. Swift <br />advised that the agency approvals are obtained between the tentative map and final map stages. <br /> <br />Is moving the Simoni estate lot onto the Lonestar property acceptable? - Yes. Commissioner <br />Kameny advised that he likes the idea of having the continuation of vineyard along old Vineyard <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />Is the continuous house "edge" of Lots 34-42 acceptable? - Commissioner Maas noted that <br />Wente prefers not to have it because of maintenance of the vineyards. Commissioner Arkin <br />stated that it would be nice. He suggested the applicant provide a visual depicting the backs of <br />the homes. He further suggested additional tree planting or architecture for the backs of homes <br />on lots 34 - 42. Chairperson Sullivan and Commissioner Kameny voiced their concurrence. <br /> <br />Is the trail interface satisfactory? - Commissioner Arkin noted that he wants the trail to be <br />completed prior to occupancy of homes, to alleviate objections to the trail approval. O.K. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas requested that the Planning Commission be advised of the value of the <br />heritage trees that are being removed. <br /> <br />Grading Plan - O.K. <br /> <br />Trees - O.K., with Commissioner Maas' request for the value of the heritage trees that are being <br />removed. <br /> <br />r' <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />January 10,2001 <br /> <br />Page II <br />