My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
051810
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2010 12:31:54 PM
Creation date
5/12/2010 2:37:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/18/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> In January 2009, the Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority (ACTIA) <br /> and the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) initiated a study to <br /> identify service sharing and /or consolidation opportunities between the two agencies. <br /> The study examined whether mission critical responsibilities could be delivered in a <br /> more streamlined and cost effective manner if the two agencies operated on a more <br /> integrated basis. Another project objective was to determine if there was sufficient <br /> information to allow policy makers to make a decision about whether to move forward <br /> with an implementation analysis and develop a plan for a possible integration and <br /> potential consolidation. A final report delivered to both agencies in July 2009 concluded <br /> that there were in fact attractive opportunities for a range of service sharing and <br /> integration efforts. The greatest opportunities for consolidation and efficiency <br /> improvement were in the areas of financial services, administrative services and capital <br /> project delivery. <br /> In May 2009, the consultant made a presentation to the ACTIA and the CMA Boards of <br /> Directors during a joint meeting which described the opportunities for service sharing <br /> and potential merger of operations, opportunities for cost efficiencies and estimated <br /> annual savings. The presentation pointed out that the ten -year return on investment <br /> was very good, with up -front costs relatively minor considering the long term goals and <br /> benefits. The joint meeting also discussed the potential for blending the Boards of <br /> Directors into one Board. The initial analysis was compelling enough for the Boards to <br /> move forward with an implementation analysis and plan. The Merger Implementation <br /> Plan was completed in January 2010 and accepted by the joint Boards of Directors at <br /> their January meeting. <br /> As a result of the two separate studies, both Boards of Directors at a joint meeting in <br /> January 2010 expressed support for a proposed merger of the two agencies and <br /> directed staff to bring back at a joint meeting in February the necessary actions to form <br /> a new Joint Powers Authority (JPA) which would generally have the powers of a <br /> congestion management agency and of ACTIA. The Boards further agreed on a new <br /> structure for a combined Board of Directors (see below) and expressed support for the <br /> title of Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) as the name of the new <br /> proposed JPA. <br /> In February 2010, the joint Boards approved a draft Joint Powers Agreement and <br /> directed staff to present it to the Board of Supervisors, the City Councils for all 14 cities <br /> in the County, and the Boards of AC Transit and BART. ACTIA and CMA staff are now <br /> seeking approval of the new Joint Powers Agreement and the necessary parallel <br /> changes to the CMA Joint Powers Agreement. The ACTIA Board will take steps to <br /> amend the 2000 Transportation Expenditure Plan, following a 45 day review period, to <br /> change the composition of the ACTIA Board so that it is the same as that of the <br /> proposed new commission (ACTC). Steps will also be taken to terminate ACTA and <br /> transfer the Agency's assets and liabilities to ACTC. Neither of the latter two steps <br /> requires individual action by member agencies. The goal is to achieve all the necessary <br /> approvals by July, with the new commission launching in September of this year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.