My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
051810
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2010 12:31:54 PM
Creation date
5/12/2010 2:37:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/18/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed New JPA (Alameda County Transportation Commission) Board Composition: <br /> An Ad Hoc Committee of the joint Boards of Directors considered several different <br /> scenarios for composition of the new Board, including both membership and allocation <br /> of votes. A guiding principle was that all the cities and the County needed to be <br /> represented, along with some representation from the transit operators. Votes based <br /> on populations, which change over time, following the CMA model were considered. <br /> The joint Boards of Directors approved an approach that recognized the interests of the <br /> largest cities (by population) and included both AC Transit and BART. The proposed <br /> new twenty -two member JPA Board (and the separate Boards of ACTIA and CMA) <br /> would be composed of: <br /> Each member of the Alameda County Board of Supervisors who shall each <br /> have one vote, except the longest serving Board member in attendance at the <br /> meeting who shall have two votes; <br /> Two members representing the City of Oakland, with one member (the <br /> longest serving Councilmember on ACTC or previously ACCMA or ACTIA) <br /> having three votes and the other member having one vote; <br /> One member representing the City of Fremont and one representing the City <br /> of Hayward, each of whom shall have two votes; <br /> One member from each of the other 11 cities who would each have one vote; <br /> and <br /> One representative of BART and one representative of AC Transit, each of <br /> whom shall have one vote. <br /> Only members of the bodies who have paid or allocated fees set by the ACTC Board <br /> shall be entitled to be members of the ACTC Board. If the relative populations of the <br /> cities or the unincorporated areas change significantly in the future, the Joint Powers <br /> Agreement could be amended to fairly adjust this voting allocation. ACTIA and CMA <br /> would continue in existence and would be members of the new JPA until such time as <br /> state legislation specifically naming those agencies can be amended, but they would not <br /> have separate representation on the new Board. <br /> Technical Advisory Committee and the Citizens' Watchdog Committee: <br /> The proposed JPA designates the current Alameda County Transportation Advisory <br /> Committee (ACTAC) to continue to function as the technical advisory committee to the <br /> new ACTC. Additionally, the JPA appoints the current Citizens' Watchdog Committee <br /> as described in the Alameda County 2000 Transportation Expenditure Plan which will <br /> continue to have the powers as specified in that Plan regarding the expenditure of <br /> ACTIA funds. While not mentioned in the Joint Powers Agreement, the other outside <br /> committees of each Agency would continue for the present; however, there may be <br /> some consolidation of the existing standing committees of each agency. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.