My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
110309
>
15 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2009 11:02:27 AM
Creation date
10/30/2009 10:58:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Implementation Regulations <br /> Growth Limitation Plan <br /> B. Citywide Performance Standards <br /> Identify the project impacts on Citywide performance standards for administration <br /> facilities, libraries, police, fire, and parks (see Appendix B, Table 2 -8). <br /> C. Roadway Level of Service Standards <br /> Meet Roadway Level of Service Standards (Appendix B, Table 2 -9). Projects <br /> which demonstrate that roadway level of service standards will be met or <br /> maintained shall be processed according to standard review procedures. <br /> A traffic study is required to show how roadway level of service standards will be <br /> met or maintained. The study should include a description of what methods will <br /> be used to attain the standards. <br /> Acceptable methods of traffic mitigation may include physical and /or operational <br /> improvements. Operational improvements may be required as conditions for <br /> project approval. Methods which rely on operational limitations shall be <br /> approved by the Planning Commission before an allocation for square footage can <br /> be reserved. Agreements between the applicant and the City shall be recorded to <br /> ensure continuous compliance with operational mitigation measures. Closing a <br /> business during peak hour traffic periods is not acceptable. All methods of <br /> reducing peak hour trips will need to be assessed in a traffic report and reviewed <br /> and found to be acceptable by the Transportation Administrator. <br /> D. Traffic Weighted Point System <br /> Where it cannot be demonstrated that roadway levels of service standards will be <br /> met or maintained, the project must meet specific criteria in the traffic weighted <br /> point system (see Appendix A). <br /> The traffic weighted point system is a method of selecting projects on a 100 point <br /> scale where points are deducted based on the number of net new P.M. peak hour <br /> trips generated by a project, and are credited for meeting certain development <br /> objectives (preference criteria). To receive an allocation reservation for <br /> commercial square footage, or to qualify to develop a residential project, the total <br /> project score must be higher than the minimum qualifying score established by the <br /> City Council. <br /> At the beginning of each two -year development cycle, the City Council, with <br /> recommendations from the Planning and Design Review Commissions, shall <br /> review and establish: (1) the minimum qualifying point score; (2) the peak hour <br /> trip point reduction rate; (3) the preference criteria with point values; and (4) the <br /> amount of square footage to set aside for the small project reservation pool (see <br /> Glossary for definitions). If the City Council fails to adopt new point and <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.