Laserfiche WebLink
Currently, the Growth Management Ordinance: <br /> Establishes an annual limit for new residential units (with the exception described <br /> in the previous paragraph). <br /> Requires the apportionment of new residential units to categories of projects (i.e. <br /> affordable projects; major projects; first -come, first served projects). <br /> Describes a process for obtaining an allocation under the program. <br /> In recent years, as fewer large residential development sites are available, and the <br /> number of residential units seeking building permits became significantly lower than the <br /> annual allocation, the growth management ordinance has not come into play. The <br /> proposed change to the Growth Management Ordinance which the City Council <br /> introduced on October 20, 2009, maintains the limit of 350 units per year, although it <br /> does allow exceptions when necessary to meet our RHNA obligation under State law. <br /> (See Attachment 5). <br /> Land Use Policy /Regulations: The General Plan acts to manage growth both in terms <br /> of designating a specific amount of land for residential development and by providing <br /> policies which stipulate how residential land is to be developed. <br /> Development Impact Fees: Development impact fees manage growth by providing a <br /> mechanism by which the City can maintain service levels for existing and future <br /> residents by ensuring the adequate provision of infrastructure and other services. The <br /> City of Pleasanton imposes development fees on new residential construction for parks, <br /> public facilities and traffic impacts. The Pleasanton Unified School District collects <br /> school impact fees on new residential construction. <br /> Performance Standards: An example of a performance standard is the City's Level of <br /> Service standards for traffic. Development is required to comply with this standard and <br /> to pay fees to mitigate traffic impacts in order to maintain the standard. <br /> Initiatives: Initiatives such as Measure F, the Pleasanton Ridgelands initiative enacted <br /> in 1993, and Measures PP and QQ have limited growth in specific locations. The <br /> Ridgelands initiative, for example, eliminated any significant residential development on <br /> Pleasanton Ridge, and paved the way for acquisition of much of this area for parkland. <br /> State Law: State laws such as the California Environmental Quality Act and the <br /> requirement to prepare Water Supply Assessments for certain projects also act to <br /> manage growth by ensuring that impacts on certain resources are minimized or <br /> mitigated. <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />