My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1246
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1201 - 1300
>
ORD 1246
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2004 10:09:05 AM
Creation date
3/17/1999 4:56:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1246
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e.4 Fact. Providing ladder access in accordance with <br /> City policy eliminates the potential impact. <br /> <br /> e.5 Finding. The No Project Alternative, the Reduced <br /> Intensity Alternative, and the Mixed Use <br /> Alternative, which could partially mitigate the <br /> potential significant fire hazard effect, are <br /> infeasible. These alternatives are unnecessary <br /> because the mitigation measures which have been <br /> incorporated into the Project substantially lessen <br /> the effect. <br /> <br /> e.6 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of <br /> alternatives). <br /> <br />F. Significant Effect. Increased demand for adult <br /> recreational facilities of all types. <br /> <br /> f.1 Finding. Incorporation of recreational facilities <br /> in the Project is economically infeasible. <br /> <br /> f.2 Fact. The assessments placed on the Project <br /> property and its value make infeasible its use for <br /> recreational facilities. <br /> <br /> f.3 Finding. Surplus revenues generated by North <br /> Pleasanton development, including the Project, may <br /> be available to acquire and develop new park and <br /> recreational facilities. <br /> <br /> f.4 Fact. The Project will generate revenues in excess <br /> of its expenses. <br /> <br /> f.5 Finding. Inclusion of payment of fees for <br /> recreational facilities and cooperation in <br /> providing funding substantially lessens this <br /> impact. <br /> <br /> f.6 Fact. Condition 28 requires developer fees and <br /> cooperation. <br /> <br /> f.7 Finding. The No Project Alternative, the Reduced <br /> Intensity Alternative, and the Mixed Use <br /> Alternative, which could partially mitigate the <br /> potential significant effect, are infeasible and <br /> unnecessary because the mitigation measures which <br /> have been incorporated into the Project <br /> substantially lessen the effect. <br /> <br /> f.8 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of <br /> alternatives). <br /> <br />G. Significant Effect. Increased maintenance costs for <br /> additional Project streets. <br /> <br /> - 11 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.