My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1246
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1201 - 1300
>
ORD 1246
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2004 10:09:05 AM
Creation date
3/17/1999 4:56:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1246
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d.1 Finding. Implementation of an interim solution to <br /> add 4.4 MGD to the LAVWMA system should provide <br /> sufficient wastewater capacity through 1991. <br /> <br /> d.2 Fact. The LAVWMA export capacity will be expanded <br /> to 21 MGD. <br /> <br /> d.3 Finding. Long-range project planning (new <br /> facilities ADWF capacity of 42 MGD), if <br /> implemented, would substantially lessen this <br /> impact. Mitigation measures to provide interim <br /> capacity are partially not within the jurisdiction <br /> of the City. Such mitigation measures are within <br /> the jurisdiction of other public agencies and can <br /> and should be adopted. <br /> <br /> d.4 Fact. Construction of wastewater disposal <br /> facilities is within the control of LAVWMA or other <br /> regional agencies. CH2M Hill, as consultant to <br /> LAVWMA, has recommended constructing new facilities <br /> to provide a total of ADWF capacity of 42 MGD. <br /> <br /> d.5 Finding. Developer construction of a reverse <br /> osmosis plant is presently economically infeasible. <br /> <br /> d.6 Fact. Current export cost and projected costs of <br /> expanded facilities are less than treating and <br /> disposal through reverse osmosis. <br /> <br /> d.7 Finding. The No Project Alternative, the Reduced <br /> Intensity Alternative, and the Mixed Use <br /> Alternative, which could partially mitigate the <br /> potential significant effect, are infeasible. <br /> <br /> d.8 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of <br /> alternatives). <br /> <br />E. Significant Effect. Possible construction of buildings <br /> higher than current firetruck ladder capacity could <br /> impair fire protection services. <br /> <br /> e.1 Finding. The recommended mitigation measures <br /> incorporated into the Project will substantially <br /> lessen the significant fire hazard effect. <br /> <br /> e.2 Fact. Condition 7 requires that buildings which <br /> are constructed over current ladder truck <br /> capability should incorporate internal life safety <br /> fire systems standards and provide indirect access <br /> to roofs. <br /> <br /> e.3 Finding. Other fire safety mitigations are <br /> unnecessary as Condition 7 reduces the effect to an <br /> insignificant level. <br /> <br /> - 10 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.