ORD 1246 - Laserfiche WebLink

require American River or other supply sources. Scenario 1 demand would also require this additional supply depending on EBMUD policy to serve other areas. b.1 Finding. Users of these water supplies are not the Project, but, rather, potentially induced growth. If inadequate water supply exists, growth will not occur. The responsibility for providing water and ensuring water conservation is agencies with no jurisdiction over the Project. b.2 Fact. EBMUD jurisdiction does not extend into Pleasanton. b.3 Finding. Additional mitigation measures identified in the EIR (American River or other supply sources, EBMUD/CCWD joint operation) are not within the jurisdiction of the City but are within the jurisdiction of other public agencies and can and should be adopted. b.4 Fact. EBMUD has on-going litigation that will resolve its rights in the American River. EBMUD is also investigating the possibility of operating with the Contra Costa Water District. (CCWD). b.5 Finding. The No Project Alternative, the Reduced Intensity Alternative, and the Mixed Use Alternative, which could partially mitigate the significant effect, are infeasible. b.6 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of alternatives). C. Significant Effect. Generation of wastewater flow to be treated at the DSRSD treatment plant beyond current capacity. c.1 Finding. Treatment plant expansion will substantially lessen this impact. c.2 Fact. DSRSD has prepared a master plan for expansion. Expansion is economically feasible. c.3 Finding. The No Project Alternative, the Reduced Intensity Alternative, and the Mixed Use Alternative, which could partially mitigate the potential significant effect, are infeasible. c.4 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of alternatives). D. Significant Effect. Generation of wastewater beyond current and planned capacity for disposal. - 9 -