My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062508
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 062508
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:37:39 PM
Creation date
9/17/2009 10:41:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/25/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
20 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that very late in the day, staff received two emails regarding Item 6.a., <br />PUD-74, Ponderosa Homes, requesting that the item be continued to a future date. She <br />stated that due to short notice, staff was unable to convey this request to the applicant <br />prior to the hearing. She noted that one email was from Ms. Nancy Allen and the other <br />was from Ms. Jereen Gilbert. Ms. Decker added that the Commissioner’s Handbook <br />stated that a vote of a majority of the Commission would be required to consider the <br />request. <br /> <br />Chair Blank noted that although a majority is required to continue a request by a member <br />of the community, the Planning Commission has had a tradition of granting a request of <br />continuance by a member of the public. He noted that while this has been the <br />Commission’s practice, it was not required that the request be granted. He requested <br />comments from the Commissioners as to their pleasure. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox noted that she believed some of the neighborhood had not been <br />noticed. She added that she had been contacted by a resident of the Ironwood <br />development with questions about the development. She noted that she had tried to <br />obtain information from the Ponderosa sales office, only to discover that it was closed for <br />the weekend. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox moved to continue Item 6.a. to the next available date and that <br />the neighbors along Santa Rita and Valley Avenue be notified of the hearing. <br />Chair Blank seconded the motion in order to enter discussion. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum noted that she would support the motion as long as this item would <br />be continued to the July 16, 2008 Planning Commission meeting. She stated that she did <br />not believe it was fair to the applicant and that the applicant had followed the process and <br />gone through a workshop so the item could be heard. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chair Blank regarding whether there was any issue affecting <br />the hearing on July 16, Ms. Decker replied that the Planning Commission meeting dates <br />were July 9 and July 23, 2008. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she would like the item heard on July 9, 2008. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum amended the motion to state that the continued item be heard <br />on July 9, 2008. <br /> <br />The amendment was acceptable to Commissioner Fox and Chair Blank. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that according to the emails, one of the people in question <br />could not attend the meeting on the second week of July. She noted that if this item were <br />to be continued based on these concerns, it would be an empty continuance because it did <br />not mollify the concerns. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 25, 2008 Page 5 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.