My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062508
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 062508
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:37:39 PM
Creation date
9/17/2009 10:41:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/25/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
20 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Chair Blank requested input from staff regarding the noticing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson noted that was his question as well and inquired what the area of <br />notification was. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker replied that the City typically notices all property owners and residents <br />within a 1,000-foot radius of the subject site. She added that in this instance, noticing <br />was expanded to include all property owners and residents within 1,000 feet of the entire <br />Busch Property PUD boundary, which is much greater than what is legally required. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chair Blank regarding why some residents were not noticed, <br />Commissioner Fox noted that with respect to the traffic along Valley Avenue, 1,000 feet <br />from the Busch Property did not include the residences that back up from Danbury Park <br />and on the other side of Valley Avenue. She noted that on the workshop level, the <br />noticing area was 1,000 feet from the property boundary, which then included the <br />Operations Service Center and the Pleasanton Garbage Service. She added that most of <br />the noticing area for the first workshop was the Quarry area where there were no <br />residents. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired whether Ms. Decker referred to the noticing area as <br />being all of the Ironwood development. Ms. Decker replied that staff had a noticing map, <br />and added that Commissioner Fox was correct in that the noticing area for the workshop <br />that had been held was 1,000 feet from the actual subject site. She noted that as the <br />project moved forward, staff believed that a larger area should be noticed and that it was <br />reasonable to notice 1,000 feet from the entire PUD specifically because it was a change <br />in the option from a school site to senior housing and could impact the entire <br />development. She noted that Mr. Otto had a map displaying the limits for the actual <br />hearing item. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Narum’s inquiry whether any neighbors were present to <br />speak on this project, two neighbors raised their hands. <br /> <br />At Chair Blank’s request, Mr. Otto displayed the noticing map and identified the noticing <br />boundaries. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chair Blank regarding where the concerns were coming <br />from, Ms. Decker replied that she did not have the correspondents’ addresses. Chair <br />Blank noted that homes from Valley Avenue had requested notification. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor noted that both the workshop and this meeting were advertised <br />in the newspaper as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox noted that Valley Business Park on Quarry Lane had been notified but <br />that the residents in the cul-de-sacs on the south side of Valley Avenue were not notified. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 25, 2008 Page 6 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.