PC 062508 - Laserfiche WebLink

generally saw plans stamped Exhibit A, but and that the plans the Commissioners had were not stamped as Exhibit A. He added that the general public….” Commissioner O’Connor requested that the first paragraph on page 10 be modified to read as follows: “Ms. Giffin noted that based on the information available was a standard condition in 1985, and that it should have been included. Based on the information available, she noted that Condition No. 17 in the project-specific conditions of approval referenced and incorporated the standard conditions of approval, and then should have excluded some, including Item Condition No. 14, which should have been dropped. She noted that this was not a design review approval but a PUD approval.” Chair Blank requested that the first sentence of the third paragraph on page 7 be modified to read as follows: “Chair Blank noted that it was impossible when he tried to determine the state of the neighborhood in 1985 based on the minutes from the 1985 Planning Commission and City Council meetings.” Chair Blank noted that with respect to the first and second full paragraphs on page 13, he recalled an exchange where the attorney was not referenced but had indicated that staff had suggested four stories versus three stories. He requested staff to check the audio recording to confirm his recollection. Commissioner O’Connor noted that he recalled that discussion as well. Commissioner Olson noted that he also had that recollection. Commissioner Narum moved to approve the minutes of June 11, 2008, as amended. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, O’Connor, and Olsen. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: Commissioner Pearce. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. The motion passed. 3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA. There were none. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 25, 2008 Page 4 of 14