PC 062508 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Fox noted that the last sentence of the first full paragraph on page 8 has Ms. Harryman stating that Commissioner Fox had made an argument that someone should have challenged the proposal in 1985. She stated that she did not recall making that statement and requested that it be confirmed on the audio recording. Commissioner Fox requested that the following language be added to the end of the first paragraph on page 9, as follows: “She inquired how the public could have had access to see these plans if the City did not distribute them to anyone other than the Commission and the City Council, and if they were not distributed and the public did not have access, she questioned how they could have appealed the decision or challenged it in 1985.” Commissioner Olson noted that the first sentence of the fifth full paragraph on page 11 should be modified to read as follows: “In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding whether the company was a licensed residential care provider for seniors, Mr. Gray replied that was the type of license they have in the State of California.” Commissioner Fox noted that the word “She” in the last sentence of the third paragraph should be changed to “Ms. Giffin” to reflect that this was Ms. Giffin’s statement and not Commissioner Fox’s. Commissioner Fox noted that she believed there was discussion regarding whether mediation was confidential or not and that facilitation was not confidential following Ms. Harryman’s statement that “the term mediator was very specific” in the second full paragraph on page 21. She would like that discussion to be added to that paragraph. She further requested staff to double-check the audio recording as she believed a statement was made that if facilitation rather than mediation was used, minutes could be created from the facilitation process. Chair Blank stated that he believed the Commission had agreed that the decision to have minutes or not was to be left to the discretion of the Director of Planning and Community Development and the City Attorney. He noted that this was reflected in the tenth paragraph on page 20. Commissioner Olson recalled that was the case as well. Commissioner O’Connor also recalled that was the case. Commissioner Fox stated that she believed Commissioner Olson rather than Commissioner Narum had seconded the motion on page 20. Commissioner Olson noted that several amendments were made after the first motion and that he did not recall who seconded the initial motion. Commissioner O’Connor requested that the first sentence of the last paragraph on page 9 be modified to read as follows: “Commissioner O’Connor noted that the Commission PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 25, 2008 Page 3 of 14