Laserfiche WebLink
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Initial Study <br /> III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED <br /> The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one <br /> impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. <br /> n Aesthetics I I Agriculture n Air Quality <br /> Resources <br /> n Biological Resources n Cultural Resources n Geology /Soils <br /> Hazards and <br /> 1 Hydrology /Water Quality n Land Use /Planning <br /> Hazardous Materials <br /> Mineral Resources I I Noise n Population /Housing <br /> n Public Services I I Recreation n Transportation /Traffic <br /> n Utilities/ n Mandatory Findings of Significance <br /> Service Systems <br /> IV. DETERMINATION: <br /> On the basis of this initial evaluation: <br /> I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a <br /> significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project <br /> proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. <br /> Signature Date <br /> Printed name <br /> V. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> The following checklist contains the environmental checklist form presented in Appendix G of the <br /> California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The checklist form is used to describe the <br /> impacts of the proposed project. A discussion follows each environmental issue identified in the <br /> checklist. <br /> For this project, the following designations are used: <br /> Less Than Sit ficant: Impact with Mitiration Inco orated. An impact that requires mitigation to <br /> reduce the impact to a less- than significant level. <br /> Less Than Sim ficant: Impact. Any impact that would not be considered significant under CEQA <br /> relative to existing standards. <br /> No Impact. Any impact that does not apply to the project. <br /> Revised 9/4/09 7 9/4/2009 <br />