CCMIN022106 - Laserfiche WebLink

Rich Cimino, a Pleasanton resident and an original participant to the Citizens Task Force for the Alviso Adobe Community Park, said he originally believed it was a good idea to have the Adobe and the Milking Barn constructed on the flat land with two separate programs. After visiting other adobe historical parks, he believed the Park would be underutilized if it only contained the Adobe structure without any additional amenities. He believed Pleasanton had an opportunity to educate all ages depicting three different historical time periods. If the City was going to invest the money for this project, he believed it should be invested wisely. He asked Council to move forward as soon as possible with construction of the project. Vice Mayor Sullivan closed the public comments. Mr. Brozosky said the Alviso Adobe Community Park was not only unique to the City but the entire Tri- Valley region. He did not believe a phased approach would work for this project unless it included all of three distinct periods of history. He did not want to compromise any portion of the design for this project, which included a significant amount of public input. He believed a phased approach would be disruptive, and delaying the project another six months to a year would ultimately increase the overall cost of the project. He pointed out the significance of various fundraisers that were held to help offset the cost of this project. The proceeds from the fundraisers are not covering the cost overruns and the money raised could be lost due to inflation costs. He supported the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation in directing staff to proceed with the construction of this project. He was not in support of using In- Lieu Park Dedication fees to bridge the funding shortfall. He was in favor of Council using the $543,000 in funding currently allocated to other capital projects. Mr. Thorne said he has been involved with this project since 1995. He was opposed to using a phased approach for this project. He understood the Laguna Oaks neighbors' concerns and wanted to remain sensitive to the concerns. He was more concerned about getting the message out about the cultural changes that occurred, and the project's design provides opportunities for interpretation of the three distinct periods of history. He supported the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation in directing staff to proceed with the construction of this project as soon as possible. He believed the funding necessary to bridge the shortfall could be found by using $543,000 in funding currently allocated to capital projects and by using In -Lieu Park Dedication fees. Ms. McGovern concurred with Mr. Brozosky and Mr. Thorne's comments. As a former School Boardmember, she supported the project which will benefit the teachers and children in this community. She was uncomfortable with using In -Lieu Park Dedication fees to bridge the funding shortfall and would prefer to borrow and return the funds currently allocated to other capital projects. While she recognized staff's recommendation to wait six months to proceed with the construction of this project, she believed construction of the project could begin now with staff working to review the possibility of using funding currently allocated to other capital projects. Mr. Sullivan supported this project and believed the Alviso Adobe Community Park was an added amenity for Pleasanton. He recognized the concerns expressed by some of the Laguna Oaks neighbors and was hopeful that staff would work to mute the color of the Milking BarnNisitor's Center and include additional trees to screen the offsite view. He noted the importance of restoring the Dairy because it was an important part of Pleasanton's history. While he supported directing staff to proceed with the construction of this project now, he expressed concern about other capital projects, including the restoration of Kottinger Creek and Pleasanton City Council 14 02/21/06 Minutes