RES 02085A - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT MASTER PLAN FOR THE OPTS EVA LUATI 0 N CRITERIA CRITERIA FIRE STATION HISTORIC REUSE ADAPTIVE REUSE & NEW MEET BASIC + ++ PROGRAM MOST FUNCTIONAL 0 ++ SPACES RELATIONSHIP TO + ++ PARK COST + ++ HISTORICAL + + RECYCLE/REUSE ++ + IMAGE + ++ Both the alternate (Adaptive Reuse) and the recommended (Historic Reuse Plus New) strategies are compared and evaluated in the charr above. The major issues are summarized as follows. . M E E T S BAS I CPR 0 G RAM Because of the ability to build new spaces in the most advantageous arrangement, the Historic Reuse Plus New scheme is the better alternarive. . MOST FUNCTIONAL SPACES The limited ceiling height and smaller room sizes in the Adaptive Reuse scheme rate poorly compared to new program spaces that would be constructed in the addition porrion of the recommended Historic Reuse Plus New scheme. . R E LA T ION S HIP TOP ARK While the Adaptive Reuse alternate provides a new lobby oriented to the park, rhe Historic Reuse Plus New recommendation pro- vides a connecrion between the building and both the srreer and the park. . C 0 S T Because of the extensive reconstruction and replacement of building sys- tems required, there are no cost savings anticipated from the alternative strategy, the Adaptive Reuse. In terms of anticipated costs, both schemes are essentially equal. . R E C Y C L E / R E USE In terms of the City's goal of limiting impact on landfill, the Adaptive Reuse alternate scheme is better than the recommended Historic Reuse Plus New scheme, because it requires only limited demolition. ApPENDIX I - ..