Laserfiche WebLink
authorized for some facilities, and improvements <br />are anticipated to be completed in 1986. <br />a.5 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development <br />Alternative, No Project Alternative, Partial <br />Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative <br />could partially mitigate the effect. However, <br />each of these Alternatives is infeasible and <br />unnecessary as the mitigation measures <br />incorporated into the Project will substantially <br />lessen the significant effect. <br />a.6 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of <br />Alternatives). <br />a.7 Fact. See Sections IV.a.4, IV.a.2 (Water demand <br />mitigations). <br />B. Significant Effect. Large increase in water use on <br />site. <br />b.1 Finding. The mitigation measure incorporated <br />into the Project to control water use will <br />substantially lessen the effect. <br />b.2 Fact. Condition No. 48 requires installation of <br />water conserving plumbing fixtures. <br />b.3 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development <br />Alternative, No Project Alternative, Partial <br />Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative <br />could partially mitigate the effect. However, <br />each of these Alternatives is infeasible and <br />unnecessary as the mitigation measures incor- <br />porated into the Project will substantially <br />lessen the significant effect. <br />b.4 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of <br />Alternatives). <br />b.5 Fact. See Section IV.h.2 (Water conservation <br />mitigations). <br />b.6 Finding. The recommended mitigation measures, <br />of minimizing landscaping water use and indus- <br />trial water use, are unnecessary. <br />9. <br />