2380 - Laserfiche WebLink

b.7 Fact. Economic impact of wastewater connection and use fees will encourage minimization of industrial water use. There is sufficient water supply to meet the projected demand. C. Significant Effect. Generation of sewage effluent beyond capacity available to the site. c.1 Finding. The mitigation measure incorporated into the Project to control generation of sewage effluent will substantially lessen the effect. c.2 Fact. Condition No. 21 provides that building permits may be withheld by the City if sewer capacity is not available. c.3 Fact. See Sections IV.b.2 and IV.b.7 (Water saving measures which minimize effluents). c.4 Finding. A mitigation measure which has not been incorporated into the Project concerning construction of other sewer effluent disposal facilities is not within the jurisdiction of City. The recommended mitigation measure is within the jurisdiction of other public agencies and can and should be adopted. c.5 Fact. Construction of sewer effluent trans- portation and disposal facilities is within the control of DSRSD, LAVWMA and EBDA. As a member agency in LAVWMA and by agreement with DSRSD, City may participate in the decisions to expand facilities, and, pursuant to existing General Plan policies, City has urged such construction. c.6 Finding. The Reduced intensity of Development Alternative, No Project Alternative, Partial Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative could partially mitigate the effect. However, each of these Alternatives is infeasible and unnecessary as effects concerning water use demand are significantly lessened by the miti- gation measures incorporated into the Project. c.7 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of Alternatives). c.8 Fact. See Sections IV.c.2 and IV.c.3 (Sewer effluent mitigation). 10.