Laserfiche WebLink
6-3 Minimize pollutants entering riparian areas (Draft EIR, page <br /> 6-7). Said mitigation measures were considered and adopted <br /> with any pertinent changes in Condition 6-2 Exhibit "B" of the <br /> City Council staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> Finding: Mitigation Measures 6-1 through 6-3 Feasible and Required <br /> <br /> The City finds that it is feasible to mitigate these impacts to a <br /> .less-than-significant level by requiring the applicant and <br /> successors in interest to incorporate the specific provisions of <br /> Mitigations 6-1 through 6-3, as listed above, into the project' <br /> design. The applicant and successors in interest shall incorporate <br /> said biological impact reduction provisions into project design as <br /> a "Condition of Approval" to the project. <br /> <br />Loss of Heritage Valley Oaks <br /> <br /> Impact= Removal of non-heritage oaks/potential loss of heritage <br /> oaks <br /> <br /> The City finds that the project, as currently proposed, would <br /> result in the removal of four non-heritage valley oaks during <br /> development and the potential subsequent loss of 13 heritage valley <br /> oaks from potential filling or grading within the drip lines of <br /> said trees. This is a potential significant impact (Draft EIR, <br /> page 6-6).. <br /> <br /> Proposed Mitigation Measures of the EIR <br /> <br /> The EIR identified the following mitigation measures which would <br /> substantially avoid this biologic impact. <br /> <br /> 6-4 Protect oaks during construction and by project design (Draft <br /> EIR, page 6-7). Said mitigation measures were considered and <br /> adopted with any pertinent changes in Condition 6-3 Exhibit <br /> "B" of the City Council staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> 6-5 Replace lost or damaged oaks and maintain them (Draft EIR, <br /> page 6-7). Said mitigation measures were considered and <br /> adopted with any pertinent changes in Condition 6-4 Exhibit <br /> "B" of the City Council staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> Finding: Mitigation Measures 6-4 and 6-S Feasible and Required <br /> <br /> The City finds that it is feasible to mitigate this impact to a <br /> less-than-significant level by requiring the applicant and <br /> successors in interest to incorporate the specific provisions of <br /> Mitigations 6-4 and 6-5, as listed above, into the project design. <br /> The applicant and successors in interest shall incorporate such <br /> biological impact reduction provisions into project design as a <br /> "Condition of Approval" to the project. <br /> <br /> 12 <br /> <br /> <br />