My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1565
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1501 - 1600
>
ORD 1565
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2004 11:49:34 AM
Creation date
3/10/1999 7:11:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1565
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5-3 Refined Grading Plan (Draft EIR, page 5-14). Said mitigation <br /> measures were considered and adopted with any pertinent <br /> changes in Condition 5-3(A - E), Exhibit "B" of the City <br /> Council staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> Finding: Mitigation Measures 5-2 and 5-3 Feasible and Required <br /> <br /> The City finds that it is feasible to substantially avoid this <br /> impact by requiring the applicant and successors in interest to <br /> incorporate the specific provisions of Mitigation Measures 5-2 and <br /> 5-3 into the project design. The applicant and successors in <br /> interest shall incorporate such grading impact reduction into <br /> project design as a "Condition of Approval" to the project. <br /> <br />Sound Wall <br /> <br /> Impact: Inappropriate sound walls <br /> <br /> The City finds that inappropriate sound walls could diminish the <br /> visual qualities of the site. This is a significant impact (Draft <br /> EIR, page 5-9). <br /> <br /> Proposed Mitigation Measure of the EIR ' <br /> <br /> The EIR identified the following mitigation measure which would <br /> substantially Avoid this visual and site design impact. <br /> <br /> 5-4 Sound Wall Plan (Draft EIR, page 5-14). Said mitigation <br /> measures were considered and adopted with any pertinent <br /> changes in Condition 5-4, Exhibit "B" of the City Council <br /> staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> Finding: ~Mitigation Measure 5-4 Feasible and Required <br /> <br /> The City finds that it is feasible to substantially avoid this <br /> impact by requiring the applicant and successors in interest to <br /> incorporate the specific provisions of Mitigation Measure 5-4 into <br /> the project design. The applicant and successors in interest shall <br /> · incorporate such noise barrier provisions into project design as a <br /> "Condition of Approval" to the project. <br /> <br />Northwest Area of Development <br /> <br /> Impact: Ridgeline alteration visual impact <br /> <br /> The City finds that the project, as currently proposed, would lower <br /> the ridgeline in the northwest area of development and homes would <br /> be constructed on the altered ridgeline which would be silhouetted <br /> against the sky: These proposed alterations would be a significant <br /> impact (Draft EIR, page 5-9). <br /> <br /> 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.