My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1565
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1501 - 1600
>
ORD 1565
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2004 11:49:34 AM
Creation date
3/10/1999 7:11:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1565
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5-2 Vegetation/Landscape Plan (Draft EIR, page 5-13). Said <br /> mitigation measures were considered and adopted with any <br /> pertinent changes in Condition 5-2(A - G), Exhibit "B" of the <br /> City Council staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> 5-3 Refined Grading Plan (Draft EIR, page 5-14). Said mitigation <br /> measures were considered and adopted with any pertinent <br /> changes in Condition 5-3(A - E), Exhibit "B" of the City <br /> Council staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> 5-4 Sound Wall Plan (Draft EIR, page 5-14). Said mitigation <br /> measures were considered and adopted with any pertinent <br /> changes in Condition 5-4, Exhibit "B" of the City Council <br /> staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> 5-5 Light and Glare Control (Draft EIR, 5-14 .and 5-15). Said <br /> mitigation measures were considered and adopted with any <br /> pertinent changes in Condition 5-5, Exhibit "B" of the City <br /> Council staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> 5-6 Barrier Along East Property Line (Draft EIR, page 5-15). Said <br /> mitigation measures were considered and adopted with .any <br /> pertinent changes in Condition 5-6, Exhibit "B" of the Clty <br /> Council staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> .Findings Mitigation Measures 5-1 through S-6 Feasible and Required <br /> <br /> The City finds that it is feasible to mitigate this impact to a <br /> less-than-significant level by requiring the applicant and <br /> successors in interest to incorporate the specific provisions of <br /> Mitigation Measures 5-1 through 5-6 into the project design. The <br /> applicant and successors in interest shall i~.orporate such <br /> landscape alteration reduction provisions into project design, as <br /> a "Condition of Approval" to the project. <br /> <br />Grading <br /> <br /> Impact: Exposed cut and fill slopes in visually-sensitive areas <br /> <br /> The City finds that approval of the project as currently proposed <br /> would change landforms and create exposed cut slopes and fill banks <br /> in visually sensitive areas. This is a significant impact (Draft <br /> EIR, page 5-8). <br /> <br /> Proposed Mitigation Measures of the EIR <br /> <br /> The EIR identified the following mitigation measures which would <br /> substantially avoid this impact. <br /> <br /> 5-2 Vegetation/Landscape Plan (Draft EIR, page 5-13). Said <br /> mitigation measures were considered and adopted with any <br /> pertinent changes in Condition 5-2(A - G), Exhibit "B" of the <br /> City Council staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.