Laserfiche WebLink
4-5 Improvements to Sunol Boulevard Along Project Frontage: <br /> dedicate land along project frontage and pay pro-rata share of <br /> constructing the ultimate improvements (Draft EIR, page 4-18). <br /> It was determined that the applicant was required to dedicate <br /> land and construct the required improvements, therefore, said <br /> mitigation measure was considered and adopted with pertinent <br /> changes as Condition 4-5, Exhibit "B" of the City Council <br /> staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> Finding~ Mitigation Measures 4-1 through 4-5 Feasible and Required <br /> <br /> The City finds that it is feasible to mitigate this impact to a <br /> less-than-significant level and said mitigation measures shall be <br /> required as a "Condition of Approval" to the project. Said <br /> mitigation measure was considered and adopted with any pertinent <br /> changes as Condition 4-5, Exhibit "B" of the City Council staff <br /> report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br />Project-Related Daily Traffic Volume Impacts <br /> <br /> Impact= Unsafe traffic flow on Happy Valley Road at Railroad <br /> Trestle <br /> <br /> The City finds that approval of the project could result in unsafe <br /> traffic conditions on Happy Valley Road in the vicinity of the <br /> railroad trestle, due to the current narrow road width. This is a <br /> significant impact (Draft EIR, page 4-12). <br /> <br /> Proposed Mitigation Measure of the <br /> <br /> The EIR identified the following mitigation measure which would <br /> substantially avoid this impact. <br /> <br /> 4-6 Widen Happy Valley Road from Carriage Drive to Pleasanton <br /> Sunol Road (Draft EIR, page 4-19). Said mitigation measure <br /> was considered. It was determined that with the reduction in <br /> traffic and the installation of traffic light at Arlington <br /> Drive, Happy Valley Road would need to be widened but there <br /> would be no impact on Happy Valley Road at the railroad <br /> trestle. A mitigation measure was adopted with pertinent <br /> changes as Condition 4-6, Exhibit "B" of the City Council <br /> staff report dated June 16, 1992. <br /> <br /> Finding= Mitigation Measure 4-6 Feasible and Required <br /> <br /> The City finds that it is feasible to mitigate this impact to a <br /> less-than-significant level and said mitigation measure shall <br /> become a "Condition of Approval" to the project. The City shall <br /> require these improvements at the time of project development. <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br /> <br />