Laserfiche WebLink
ROLL CALLVOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Arkin, Maas, and Chairperson Roberts <br />Commissioner Sullivan <br />Commissioner Kameny and Kumaran <br />None <br /> <br />The motion carried. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Chairperson Roberts, seconded by Commissioner Arkin, that this <br />application be tabled until the Parks and Recreation Commission provides direction on Parcel E, <br />the park area. <br /> <br />ROLL CALLVOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Arkin, Maas, and Chairperson Roberts <br />Commissioner Sullivan <br />Commissioner Kameny and Kumaran <br />None <br /> <br />The motion carded. <br /> <br />(Recess taken from 10:10 p.m. to 10:15 p.m.) <br /> <br />1999 Growth Management Report and requests for Reallocations from Greenbriar Homes <br />(Bridle Creek), Trident Associates (Castlewood Estates), and Black Mountain Development <br />(Carriage Gardens) <br /> <br />Mr. Swift provided an overview of the Growth Management Report. In conclusion, Mr. Swift noted that <br />staff's recommendation is that the Commission open the public hearing, take public testimony <br />concerning growth management issues, and close the hearing; recommend approval of the draft <br />ordinance amendment; recommend total allocations for 2000 and 2001; determine whether to <br />recommend the Vineyard Corridor, golf course-related projects, and/or New Cities as "major projects"; <br />recommend sub-allocations for major projects, first-come, first-served projects, and lower-income <br />projects for 2000 and 2001; recommend reallocation of the 82 units in three projects to 2000 as <br />requested (assuming a recommended major project allocation of at least this amount) and determine <br />whether to grant new major project allocation to any of the three applicants and/or as "blocks" for the <br />Vineyard Corridor and golf course-related projects, and, if so, recommend such a major project <br />allocation to years with a sufficient sub-allocation. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to the allocation process, timeline for opening of elementary and middle <br />schools, ABAG's fair share need requirements, issues relating to infrastructure, and clarification of <br />Table No. 3. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 8, 1999 Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />