My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/10/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 11/10/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:07:55 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:34:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/10/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/10/99
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Tim Matthius, architect, provided an overview of the plans and answered questions from the <br />Commission including the length of time for construction, whether stained glass will be utilized in the <br />building, the height of the cupolas and whether pitch of roof can be altered., and the possibility of <br />transplanting the heritage trees. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin noted his support with the aesthetics of the facility. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan expressed concern with the height of the building due to it not being compatible <br />with adjacent buildings. He noted that the apartments across the street are two-story and are the highest <br />buildings in the vicinity. He noted he would be in support of the church expanding; however, he noted <br />this comer is very visible for a building of this height. He noted that there are a number of large trees <br />being removed and suggested that there be a condition for two or three additional 24-inch box trees. He <br />noted there are inconsistencies in the requirements for removal of heritage trees between homeowners <br />and developers. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kumaran noted his support with the addition to the church. He noted he would be in <br />support of adding additional 24-inch box trees to the project. He noted there should be more stringency <br />for removal of heritage trees. Commissioner Kumaran noted he would vote in support of the project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas expressed concern with "U-turns" being made from Hopyard onto Del Valle <br />Parkway to enter the church parking lot. She noted she had no problem with expansion of the church; <br />however, she had concerns with "U-turns" being made into the parking lot. Mr. Higdon noted that the <br />church could request that members of the congregation utilize Golden to gain access into the parking lot. <br />Commissioner Maas noted she would be in support of closing off the Del Valle Parkway driveway and <br />entering the parking lot from Golden. Mr. Plucker noted that staff is in favor of the two approaches into <br />the parking lot due to the trip sources being fairly distributed. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to erecting a "no U-tm" sign on Hopyard and Del Valle and the Traffic <br />Commission examining issues relating to a "no U-turn" sign. <br /> <br />Chairperson Roberts suggested that a recommendation be made to the Traffic Committee to examine <br />issues relating to ingress/egress into the church's parking lot including the "U-mm" into the parking lot. <br />Further, that the congregation be discouraged from making a left-hand mm from Hopyard onto Del <br />Valle Parkway. <br /> <br />Chairperson Roberts noted that she approved of the architecture of the building and would not be in <br />favor ora church with a flat roof. Further, that the church will be aesthetically pleasing on this comer. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin noted his support with the design of the church. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kumaran made a motion to find that the project would not have a significant effect on the <br />environment and adopt a resolution approving the attached draft Negative Declaration; make the <br />conditional use permit findings as listed in the staff report; approve the conditional use permit <br />application (Case UP-99-40) subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit "B. 1," and, approve the design <br />review application (Case Z-99-212) subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit "B.2." Further, that two <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 5 November 10, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.