My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/13/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 10/13/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:07:39 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:31:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/13/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/13/99
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Discussion ensued relating to the color of buildings, the height of the building, where cars will be parked <br />and worked on, location of the fence, and issues relating to the spray booth. Commissioner Arkin noted <br />he visited the property and would desire more vegetation between the project and the street. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />Frank Auf der Maur, Jr., 4432 Pleasanton Avenue, noted that the applicant is in concurrence with staff's <br />conditions on approval of the project. He expressed his concern with staff's requirement for black vinyl <br />coated chain link fence around the parameter and noted the applicant would be in favor of utilizing <br />galvanized metal chain link fencing with redwood or plastic slates that would hide the cars being worked <br />on. He referenced the color board for the buildings and noted that galvanized sheet metal will be <br />utilized on the building on the awnings and the drain pipes, and the applicant has inquired of staff <br />whether it would be appropriate to paint the exhaust stack to match the building. Further, that the <br />galvanized metal fence would architecturally match the building. He noted that currently there are no <br />other uses in the area to create impacts on parking. Further, that vehicles parked in the area are usually <br />from people accessing the creek and Shadow Cliffs. He noted that when the City expressed concern <br />with cars parking on vacant lots, the applicant approached the owners of Diablo Auto Body and the cars <br />were removed that same day. He noted that the two-hour parking requirement is still not being enforced <br />and if parking concerns arise in the future that the applicant will address those issues. He noted that <br />extra parking spaces are being provided and that 30 cars can park inside the building. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Roberts, Mr. Auf der Maur noted he would desire the slats that <br />are aesthetically pleasing and they would also remove parked cars from the public's view. Mr. Aufder <br />Maur commented on the fencing that could be utilized, such as a sound wall, and he stated that the <br />design will locate the fence toward the back of the property. He noted that the applicant's desire is to <br />provide a fence that is both economical and addresses the issue of keeping the vehicles away from <br />public view. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to a wooden fence not being secure enough, staff's recommendation for the <br />fencing being a requirement for projects of this type, and that the fencing requested by Mr. Auf der <br />Maur would not be detrimental to the appearance of the project. In response to an inquiry by <br />Commissioner Maas, Mr. Auf der Maur noted he would not have a problem with moving the spray <br />booth; however, he noted that the applicant has hired a consultant to lay out the design of the body shop <br />in the most efficient way and this plan references what the consultant has determined is efficient. He <br />requested that the condition read that the applicant will work with staff on either relocating it, coming up <br />with some kind of screening, or making the ducts presentable and not being an eyesore. Further, that the <br />exhaust stack will be moved if the issue is not ultimately resolved with staff. <br /> <br />Kent H. Pryer, 3425 Bernal Avenue, noted he is not opposed to the design of the project or the planning <br />for the area. He noted that the report did not state the dimensions of the exhaust stack, other than the <br />four feet height. He inquired as to the length, width or diameter of the exhaust stack and its proposed <br />distance from the front of the building. Mr. Pryer noted that if that exhaust stack adds only five percent <br />to the visual of the body of the building, there should not be a problem; however, if it takes up a major <br />portion of the building it would be a significant change. He commented that Bemal does not have any <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes October 13, 1999 <br /> Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.