My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/09/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 06/09/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:06:15 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:08:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/9/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/09/99
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Approval of the Bernal Property Specific Plan for the 510-acre site to allow development of <br /> up to 1,900 residential units, up to 755,000 square feet of commercial/office space, an <br /> 18-hole golf course, parks, an elementary school, and associated uses. <br /> Approval of corresponding zoning actions as follows: <br /> Prezone the 439.7 acres of the Bernal Property in unincorporated Alameda County to <br /> Pleasanton's Planned Unit Development (PUD) District <br /> Rezone the approximately 70.3 acres of the Bernal Property already within the jurisdiction <br /> of the City of Pleasanton from I-P (Industrial Park) to Planned Unit Development <br /> (PUD) District. <br /> Rezone the one-acre parcel owned by the City of Pleasanton from I-P (Industrial Park) to P <br /> (Public and Institutional). <br /> Prezone the portion of the Alameda County Transportation Corridor to Planned Unit <br /> Development (PUD) - Transportation Corridor. <br /> Prezone the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way to Planned Unit Development (PUD) - <br /> Transportation Corridor <br /> Approval of a comprehensive PUD Development Plan for the Bernal Property, <br /> incorporating Development Standards and Design Guidelines, to govern future <br /> development of the Bernal Property. <br /> Approval of the Preannexation Development Agreement, Growth Management Agreement, <br /> Bernal Interchange Construction and Reimbursement Agreement, Bernal Bridge <br /> Construction and City Consultant's Fees Agreement, Agreement for Conveyance of <br /> Real Estate - Park Expansion Parcel, Agreement for Conveyance of Real Estate -Civic <br />_ Center Property, and Verona Road Agreement for the Bernai Property project. <br /> <br /> Chairperson Kumaran noted that the Commission has identified June 9, June 14, June 23 and June 28, <br /> 1999 as the four meeting dates for public input and discussion of the San Francisco Bemal property. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift referenced a report dated May 17, 1999 relating to the Bernal Property Environmental Impact <br /> Report (EIR) and the CEQA process which the Planning Commission and City Council must follow in <br /> reviewing the Bemal Property project. <br /> <br />In addition, Mr. Swift referenced a report dated March 19, 1999, entitled, "Materials related to the San <br />Francisco Bernal Property Application," and provided an overview of the materials utilized in the review <br />of the San Francisco Bernal Property application including the Specific Plan, PUD Development Plan, <br />Development Standards and Design Guidelines, Preannexation Development Agreement, Bemal <br />Interchange Construction and Reimbursement Agreement, Growth Management Agreement, Bernal <br />Bridge Construction and City Consultant's fees agreement, Agreement for Conveyance of Real Estate <br />Park - Expansion Parcel, Agreement for Conveyance of Real Estate - Civic Center property, Verona <br />Road Agreement, the Final EIR report, Fiscal Impact Analysis Report for the Bernal Specific Plan, and <br />the Feasibility of City purchase of the property. <br /> <br />Further, Mr. Swift referenced a staff report dated June 9, 1999, and highlighted key areas contained in <br />the.report including background information, project description, the proposed Planning Commission <br />review process, the scope of commissioner review, and the Bernal property purchase option. In <br />conclusion, he noted that staffs recommendation is that the Commission agree to the review process <br /> <br />PLANN1NG COMMISSION MINUTES Page 3 June 9, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.