My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 04/14/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 04/14/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:05:59 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:02:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/14/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 04/14/99
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Sullivan noted that the building is aesthetically pleasing and stated that his only concern <br />was the project's proximity to the creek and the possibility for flooding and erosion; however, due to the <br />applicant and staff being comfortable with the situation, he would be in support of approving the project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny stated it is a well-designed project, especially as it relates to the restrictions <br />imposed by the shape of the lot. He noted that the project is aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood. <br />He conunended the applicant for incurring the expense of the articulation on the westerly side due to it <br />only being visible from the parking lot. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper commented on the shape of the lot and the applicant's ability to erect a building <br />on the lot. He noted that the landscaping will add to the design. Further, that the building is a good use <br />for the area and will be an asset to Old Santa Rita Road. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Sullivan, seconded by Commissioner Kameny, finding that <br />the project would not have a significant effect on thc environment; that a resolution be adopted <br />approving the attached draft Negative Declaration; and, finding that the project has a de minimis <br />impact on the site's wildlife. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Kameny and Sullivan <br />None <br />Chairperson Kumaran and Commissioners Maas and Roberts <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-99-28 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Sullivan, seconded by Commissioner Kameny, to make the <br />PUD findings as listed in the staff report; and, recommend approval of the PUD rezoning and <br />development plan subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B." <br /> <br />ROLLCALLVOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Kameny and Sullivan <br />None <br />Chairperson Kumaran and Commissioners Maas and Roberts <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-99-29 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 5 April 14, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.