PC 04/14/99 - Laserfiche WebLink

A motion was made by Commissioner Kameny, seconded by Commissioner Sullivan, approving the design review and conditional use permit applications, Z-98-342 and UP-99-04 subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit "B" and "C" and staffs memo dated April 14, 1999. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Cooper, Kameny and Sullivan None Chairperson Kumaran and Commissioners Maas and Roberts None Resolution No. PC-99-27 was entered and adopted approving Case Z-98-342/UP-99-04 as motioned. PUD-98-18, Robert S. Enea Application for Planned Unit Development rezoning to PUD - O (Planned Unit Development ~ Office) and development plan approval for the construction of an approximately 3,220 square-foot, two-story office building located at 3925 Old Santa Rita Road. Zoning for the property is C-S (Service Commercial) District. Mr. Iserson referenced the staff report dated April 14, 1999, and highlighted key areas contained in the report including background information, project description, building design, site development standards, parking, grading and drainage plan, landscape design, replacement of sidewalk along Old Santa Rita Road, traffic, signage, and public notice. In conclusion, he stated that staff's recommendation is that the Commission find that the project would not have a significant effect on the enviromnent and adopt a resolution approving the attached draft Negative Declaration; find that the project has a de minimis impact on the site's wildlife; make the PUD findings as listed in the staff report; and, recommend approval of the PUD re×oning and development plan subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B." Discussion ensued relating to parking spaces, possible ways to separate driveway from landscaped areas, and whether an analysis has been performed of possible future flooding of the creek. Mr. Higdon responded that staff has looked into the issue and has concluded that flooding will not be a problem since the creek has been designed appropriately. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Tom Kubo, representing the Applicant, expressed appreciation to staff for their work on project. He noted the mitigation measures taken by the applicant and stated that the applicant is in concurrence with the conditions listed in Exhibit "B." The architect provided an overview of the landscaping for the project. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 4 April 14, 1999