PC 121300 - Laserfiche WebLink

to be comidered for non-enclasure as long as the urban runoff standards are met. Commissioner Maas seconded the motion. Commfmioner Arkin suggested that wording be added to Condition #3 stating that the applicator is aware that they may not be able to get a permit to continue the business at this location and that the Planning Commission may not approve this particular use on this site. Commiasio~er Roberts agreed to the amendment. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: A SE r: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Arkin~ Maas, Roberts, and Sullivan None Commissioner Kameny None R~solution No. PC-2000-67 was entered and adopted as motioned. Co ~ 7~55, GHC Bermd lavestor~. LLC Application for Vesting Tentative Map (Tract 7255) approval to allow the subdivision of appeoximately 510 acres to accommodate 581 residential units, 745,000 sq.ft, of office development, 5,000 sq.fl, of commercial development, and approximately 320 acres of open space area in a manner consistent with the governing PUD Development Plan (PUD-02) appwved for the former San Francisco Water Department's Bemal Avenue lxoperty. Zoning for the property is Planned Unit Development. C~eg Plucker presented the staff report, noting that the application being reviewed this evening is for the development of Phase I of the site, and that Phase II will be the public use portion of the property. He advised that the tentative map was developed in accordance with Alternative A of the approved PUD development plan and includes the eastern area development. He further advised Chat staffbelieves that the tentative map is consistent with the approved PUD development plan and the plan for the east area is consistent with what the City Council had approved. Mr. Plucker noted that the staff report reviews the conditions of approval that were to be resolved in conjunction with the tentative map and statTbelieves that the developer has satisfied all of these conditions. Mr. Plucker referred to staff's memorandum which was distributed this evening which provides minor modifications to several conditions of approval made due the result of discussions between the applicant and staff following the publication of the staff report. In response to a question from Commission Arkin, Mr. Plucker provided clarification oftbe tentative tract map and final map process, noting that the tentative map creates lots and major parcels that will be subject to subsequent final maps. Staff'provided further clarification regarding the City Council approval process for final maps. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 13, 2000 Page 13