Laserfiche WebLink
there is a program called Community Energy Authority with State legislation that provides <br />funding to allow communities to take control of energy management. <br /> <br />Chairperson Sullivan stated that he would like to see Pleasanton take control of its energy <br />destiny and work with PG&E to see how to address the energy short-fall over the next two years <br />and develop a longer term plan and strategies. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that the kinds of alternatives that Chairperson Sullivan is <br />diseussiag are usually presented in the EIR. She questioned why an EIR has not been done. She <br />stated that the alternatives should include the placement of the power plant. She questioned the <br />deadline, and asked if the deadline is absolutely necessary. She cited an article in the Wall Street <br />Journal regarding the dissolution oflSO Board and she questioned how this would affect Enron's <br />potential subsidy. <br /> <br />The following issues and questions were raised by Commissioner Roberts: <br /> Is it possible to reduce the size of the stacks if the project is consmaeted a little later, <br /> thereby allowing additional time to manufacture the shorter stacks7 <br />- Concern about the use of Highway 84 as the traffic route for truck traffic, especially <br /> lrucks carrying ha~Rrdons materials. <br /> Concern about the water usage. The potential use of R/O water needs to be analyzed. <br /> Need more noise studies, with studies in Vintage Hills and areas higher in the hills. <br /> The issue regarding landscaping needs to be reviewed. (She noted that apparently Kiewit <br /> doesn't want potential heritage trees planted on its property.) <br /> The gas line and potential impacts and users need to be analyzed. <br /> Concern about the cumulative impacts of another facility across the street and one in <br /> Livermore, and this should be discussed (possibly in an EIR). <br /> How might the facility alleviate the need for the transmission line? An analysis needs to <br /> be done as to the current and future needs. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Commissioner Roberts, Mr. Pavan confirmed that the public <br />review of the negative declaration would extend to when the Council reviews the application or <br />through the EIR period, if an EIR is prepared. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts encouraged residents to talk with the Enron representatives if they would <br />like them to speak to their community groups. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny commented on recent articles in the newspaper regarding private power <br />plants. <br /> <br />The following issues and questions were raised by Commissioner Kameny: <br /> Will the energy generated in this plant be used strictly in the Valley or in Pleasanton? <br /> The noise in the area he lives in is very loud, especially the noise fi~om the gravel <br /> quarries. The questions regarding noise need to be answered. <br /> Concerned about air quality. He noted that the emissions reduction credits make business <br /> sense, but not health sense. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 8, 2000 Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />