My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092700
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
PC 092700
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
8/1/2001 5:45:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/27/2000
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 092700
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Pavan noted that the setback for the pool as shown on the drawing is approximately 65 feet <br />from th~ east property line. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Commissioner Arkin, Mr. Pavan advised that the project planner <br />will sign-off the construction drawings and the building inspector will make a site inspection <br />when the pool is formed to make sure the setbacks are met. <br /> <br />Mr. Larson, the applicant, noted that the pool is being installed exactly where the old pool was <br />located. He advised that the old pool was approximately 15 feet by 30 feet, and the new pool is <br />approximately 20 feet by 40 feet. <br /> <br />lqJBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Commbsioner Kameny made a motion to make the conditional use permit findings and <br />approve Case PCUP-18, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit "B.' Commissioner <br />Ad-kin seconded the motion. <br /> <br />I~OLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Kameny, and Roberts <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Commissioners Maas and Sullivan <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Resolugon No. PC-00-56 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />bo <br /> <br />~!1R-63, Gre~ Mnnn nnd Waiahat Ali <br />Appliclaion for design review approval of an approximately 6,900 square foot, split-level, <br />one- and two-story, single-family house on an approximately 1.8-acre site located at 9900 <br />Longview Lane. Zoning for the property is H-P-D (Hillside Planned Development <br />District). <br /> <br />Mr. Pavan presented the staff report, noting that the Planning Commission conducted a work <br />session on this project, at which time the Commission provided comments to the applicant. He <br />noted that the project has been redesigned and is before the Commission this evening. Mr. Pavan <br />stated that at the work session Commissioner Rob~. rts requested that non-reflective window <br />glazing be used. He noted that the condition for this requirement had inadvertently been omitted, <br />but that it could be included. Mr. Pavan provided an overview of the issues pertaining to the <br />proposal, including geotechnical, concerns of the Longview Homeowners Assocation, Wildland <br />Fire lvtmnagement and the effect on existing trees and the proposed building siting, building <br />design, and tree preservation. He provided a color board for the Commission's review. He <br />noted that staff feels the only way to decrease the visibility of the house is to decrease the size of <br />the home and suggests that the Planning Commission discuss the issue of visibility and provide <br />direction to the applicant if deemed appropriate. He reported that the project meets the spirit of <br />the current West Foothill Road Corridor Overlay District and that the proposal meets the <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />September 27, 2000 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.