PC 080200 - Laserfiche WebLink

remain the same. He commented that the exhibit with the golf course was provided to demonstrate that a nine-hold course could fit on the Western Parcel. He noted that the potential channel widening by Zone 7 also affected the earlier San Francisco proposal. He stated that this design would provide opportunity for nine additional holes to be located on the Central Parcel. Mr. Costanzo presented the revised site plan for the apartments. He noted that the revisions reflect earlier concerns expressed by the Commission. In response to a question from Commissioner Maas, Mr. Costanzo advised that a pool is not included in the plan. Mr. Mark Lazzarini of James Guthrie & Associates Architects noted that a pool could be an option. He advised that the entire amenity package needs further review. Commissioner Arkin asked if decisions regarding outdoor lighting, walkways, and color mix could be determined at a later time. Mr. Swif~ advised that a landscape plan could be completed later. Mr. Larry Flack of James Guthrie & Associates Architects, noted that staff's comments were received aRer the exhibits were prepared and are not reflected in the drawings. Commissioner Maas asked what the structure closest to Valley Avenue was. Mr. Flack responded that this is a carport structure. He noted that it could be relocated. Commissioner Maas stated that she feels it is important to provide adequate landscaping along Valley Avenue. Mr. Costanzo reported that it is the applicant's intent to provide color boards and additional requested information for the Planning Commission's review prior to making their decision on August 9. Mr. Cosmnzo presented the landscaping plan for the Village Commons area. Commission Maas stated that she would like to see a water feature through the common area into the apartment area. Mr. Costanzo responded that one of the issues with a water feature is that the City does not want to take on the ownership of it. Mr. Swift stated that the City doesn't normally want to take on the responsibility for areas such as this, as they are costly to maintain. It was noted that the Park and Recreation Commission will be reviewing this plan on Monday. Dan Rosenhaum of South Bay Development, the commercial developer, presented the modifications that have been made in response to issues raised by the Planning Commission and staff. Terry Lofrano of MBH Architects, presented the color and material board, and reviewed the revisions to the architectural details of the buildings. He described the "stepping back" treatment of the fourth floor and the building entrances. He noted that showers are provided on the ground floor of all buildings, as previously recommended by the Commission. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Kameny, it was noted that the highest point of the roof surface on the buildings is 68 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION lVffNUTES August 2, 2000 Page 4