PC 071200 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Sullivan noted he would vote in support of approving the application and expressed appreciation to the applicant for working concurrently with the neighbors on this project. He expressed support with the condition that utilizes the drainage strip. He acknowledged the applicant's use of nighttime lighting for safety reasons; however, he expressed concern with the impacts of nighttime lighting on the surrounding neighbors. He requested that when the detailed lighting plan is submitted to staff for review, staff be ~lcouraged to minimize off-site lighting impacts to the neighbors as much as possible. Commissioner Maas and Chairperson Robert concurred with the comments made by the Commissioners. A motion was made by Commissioner l~meny, seconded by Commissioner Arkin, to approve the design review appflcotion Case PDR-44 subject to the recommended conditions shown in Exlflbit "B.I'; make the variance findings listed in the staff report; approve Case PV-16 subject to the recommended conditions in Exhibit "B.I'; make the conditional use permit findings listed in the staffreport; and, approve Case PUCP*ll subject to the recommended conditions in Exhibit "B.2.' Further, that Condition No. 9 be amended to include that there be signage indicating a "No left turn" sign exiting Pimlico Drive. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Arkin, Kameny, Maas, Sullivan, and Chairperson Roberts None None None Resolution No. PC-2000-42 was entered and adopted as motioned. PDR-63. 9900 Loa~,view Lane, Gr~ Munn Work study session of a design review application for an approximately 8,558-square foot, split-level, one and two-story, single.family house located on an approximately 1.8- acre site on 9900 Longview Lane. The subject property is zoned H-P-D (Hillside Planned Development) District. Mr. Plucker referenced a staff'report dated July 12, 2000 and highlight~l key areas contained in the report including project description, issues for consideration by the Commission, building design, building floor area, site plan, grading, tree preservation, and the West Foothill Road Core Overlay DisU'iet. In conclusion, he noted that staff's recommendation is that the Commission review the proposed project, hear all public testimony, and provide direction to the applicant regarding the issues raised in the work session staff report. Mr. Plucker further noted that the Commission could conduct a straw vote. Discussion ensued relating to the previous approvals on the project, slope requirement, clafifieatiun of the term "lot of record," design approval of home, clarification of HPD dislriets, utilities offered in the area, and whether a gentechnical study will be required. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES .July 12, 2000 Page 5