Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />Robert Cox and Jeffrey Torres, the applicants, noted they had several meetings with staff on <br />relocating the antique business to the location on Stanley Boulevard. Mr. Cox stated he has <br />operated an antique business in downtown Pleasanton for 15 years, however, due to increasing <br />rent in the downtown area, the business was moved to the Stanley Boulevard location. He stated <br />that his store will sell both antiques and home furnishings and he provided a clarification of what <br />constitutes home furnishings. Mr. Cox commented on what staff has suggested for signage and <br />he expressed disagreement with those recommendations. Mr. Cox continued by stating that the <br />signs on the building were temporary while painting was being performed and that the window <br />signs have been removed. He stated he would be in favor of retaining three cabinet signs and <br />painted plywood sign, as previously approved in the permanent signage program; a painted wall <br />sign, facing west onto Stanley Boulevard; a new monument sign; three neon signs; a painted <br />fluorescent window sign; and the name on the existing wood monument sign. Mr. Cox advised <br />the Commission he is the only tenant with frontage visibility onto Stanley Boulevard and <br />California and commented on the size of the signs of other businesses in the immediate vicinity. <br />He noted that the time taken to resolve the sign issue has affected his business. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maa~ Mr. Cox noted he has a ten-year lease for the <br />building. Further, Mr. Cox stated that the building at the present time with no signage is <br />consistent with the code. Commissioner Maas suggested, as a compromise, retaining the two <br />cabinets signs with overhead, antique, tulip-style lighting; retaining the plywood sign over the <br />entrance with the name of the business; eliminating the east and west signs on the sides of the <br />building; and installing a new monument sign in the front of the building. <br /> <br />Mr. Plucker noted that staff would not be in support of a separate monument sign for the antique <br />business; however, staff would be in support a monument sign listing all the businesses in this <br />business complex. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to clarification of staff's recommendation for signage and the <br />allowable time for temporary signage. <br /> <br />Chairperson Roberts noted that due to the high visibility of this business to Stanley Boulevard, <br />limited signs are needed. She noted her surprise with an antique store utilizing this location and <br />noted that the majority of the businesses in this area are car-oriented businesses. She suggested <br />tl-.at three signs be permitted on the front of the building with no signage on the sides of building. <br />In addition, if a new monument sign is desired, that the owner of the building and the other <br />tenants of the building be included in the proposal for a new monument sign. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that the signage requested by the applicants is excessive due to the <br />visibility of the location. He noted that a 30-foot sign over the entrance is excessive. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 26, 2000 Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />