PC 020900 - Laserfiche WebLink

r A motion was made by Commissioner Arkin, seconded by Commissioner Kameny, to approve tile proposed modification to tile "Fint Amendment to Development Agreement." ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Arkin, Karneny, Maas, and Chairperson Roberts None None Commissioner Sullivan The motion passed on a four to zero vote. Resolution No. PC-20OO-11 was entered and adopted as motioned. d. Z-99-290. Bob 8Dd ROBi Penta Application for a design review approval to construct a two-story, 4,419-square-foot custom home on a vacant lot located at 8093 Bethel Lane. Zoning for the property is PUD-LDR (planned Unit Development - Low Density Residential) District. r Mr. Plucker referenced a staff report dated February 9, 2000 and highlighted key areas contained in the report including background infonnation, project site and description, geotechnical study, tree study, visual analysis, and landscape plan. In conclusion, he stated that staff's recommendation is that the Commission approve Case Z-99-290, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B." Discussion ensued relating to the location of the buildable part of the lot, the proximity of the building to the backdrop, the location of oak trees, clarification of the term "pier and grade foundation," and the meeting between the applicants and the neighbors. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Bob Perata, applicant, noted that all issues were resolved with the neighbors and that a landscaping plan was developed to satisfy all parties. He commended the planner for her work on the project and provided the Commission with a sample of the colors for the project. Discussion ensued relating to the hammerhead turnaround. Bob Sarrasin, 3860 Blackhawk Drive, Danville, noted that the buildable lot area had been previously approved and that the buildable lot area is the entire upper pad area extending to the front property lines and does not extend all the way down the hillside. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Roberts, Mr. Sarrasin noted the only condition the applicant does not agree with is Condition No. 17. He noted that the applicant might be agreeable to the condition if they could view other buildings that utilize the suggested colors. He noted that the applicants are concerned that Condition No. 17 will cause the house to resemble a battleship. He further noted that the applicant is amenable to changing the window frame color. r PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 9, 2000 Page 9