Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r' <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny encouraged the applicant to work with staff to make sure the colors on <br />the windows, mullions, roof, and exterior of the building meet the existing Foothill Road <br />Corridor Overlay District design guidelines to avoid having to resolve color issues at a future <br />time. <br /> <br />Mr. Sarrasin noted that the applicant would like closure on the color issue; however, the <br />applicants would be willing to work with staff to resolve this. Mr. Plucker noted that this color <br />has been used successfully on other projects. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas expressed concern with the landscaping at the Hogarty house. <br /> <br />Mr. Sarrasin expressed appreciation to staff for their effort in meeting with the parties and <br />resolving landscaping mitigation with neighbors. He noted that an agreement has been reached <br />that pleases all parties. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />Neil Nelson, 8088 Bethel Lane, noted that the Foothill Corridor Overlay District guidelines are <br />being revised and that the City of Pleasanton has hired an architect to make recommendations on <br />colors for homes in the Foothill Corridor Overlay District. He noted that the architect <br />recommended that the homeowners be able to use white as a trim color. He requested that the <br />Commission approve the application and allow the applicant to proceed with his personal <br />preference for colors under the previous guidelines. He noted he had no objection to the setback <br />of the Perata house to his home. He expressed support for the landscaping proposal and stated <br />that issues relating to preserving viewsheds and privacy are still being resolved. He commented <br />on the hammerhead and stated that one of the planners commented that the new fire marshal may <br />not require the hammerhead to be a permanent fire road turnaround. He inquired, if that were the <br />case, whether property owners will be informed in writing whether there may be parking on the <br />hammerhead if the City abandons the turnaround road, or if this is a condition of approval. <br /> <br />Mr. Plucker noted he has not received any information relating to the City abandoning the fire <br />turnaround and he commented on the process if the fire road were abandoned by the City. <br />Mr. Nelson requested that this issue be resolved. <br /> <br />Chairperson Roberts noted that the easement for the fire turnaround is not part of the conditions <br />for this project. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to the geotechnical study and testing conducted. In response to an <br />inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan, Mr. Plucker noted that the new geotechnical investigation <br />based on this plan would be performed at the design level. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas expressed concern with the Hogarty's views being affected; however, she <br />noted the Hogarty's were aware of the house being built. She expressed appreciation to the <br />applicants for working with the neighbors. She requested that construction hours be limited to <br />Monday through Friday. She expressed concurrence with the open fencing and decking to <br />protect views. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />February 9, 2000 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />