PC 020900 - Laserfiche WebLink

A motion was made by Commissioner Kameny, seconded by Commissioner Maas, that the f" Commilsion approve Case PUD-81-30-81D, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit "B," with the addition of a condition to designate a smoking area around the side of the building aad a second condition to encourage the applicant to comply with Title 24 requirements to be energy-efliclent and generally seek to comply with the energy-efficiency guidelines of the U.S. Green BuDding Council. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Arkin, Kameny, Maas, Sullivan and Chairperson Roberts None None None Resoiution No. PC-2000-08 was entered and adopted as motioned. b. flJD..82-19-6M. Pacific BeD Application for a PUD major modification to allow the following: (I) the construction of a new one-story administrative office building which is proposed to be approximately 4,000 square feet in size and 19 feet in height (including the roof equipment screen); (2) the construction of approximately 36 new parking stalls; and (3) new landscaping and modifications to the existing landscaping on the site located at 7240 Johnson Drive. Zoning for the property is PUD (planned Unit Developed) - G & LI (General and Light Industrial) District. The Planning Commission will also consider the negative declaration prepared for the project. ~ Mr. Plucker referenced a staffreport dated February 9, 2000 and highlighted key areas contained in the report including background information, project description, adjacent uses, site development standards, traffic, parking, building design, landscape design, fencing, and signing. He further noted that the Commissioners were given a memorandwn dated February 9, 2000, Conditions of Approval for Case PUD-82-19-6M, relating to traffic mitigation measures which may be selected in lieu of the West Las Positas interchange. In conclusion, he noted that staff's recommendation is that the Commission recommend approval of Case PUD-82-19-6M to the City Council by: (1) finding that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment and adopting a resolution approving the attached negative declaration; (2) finding that the project has a De Minimis impact on the site's wildlife; (3) finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan; (4) making the PUD findings listed in the staff report; and (5) recommending approval to the City Council of the proposed PUD major modification subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B." Discussion ensued relating to landscaping, overall traffic issues, and traffic mitigation measures. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. r PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 9, 2000 Page 5